Another 'which code for EICR'.. | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Another 'which code for EICR'.. in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

HappyHippyDad

-
Esteemed
Arms
Supporter
Joined
Dec 18, 2011
Messages
5,278
Reaction score
5,773
Location
Gloucestershire
I realise coding for EICR's can be quite judgemental and theres quite a few discussions on them but I was hoping for a bit of reassurance/advice with the following (I have not yet written the report):

1. I feel this would be a C2, my reasoning is that its a great big hole with live conductors visible?

[ElectriciansForums.net] Another 'which code for EICR'.. [ElectriciansForums.net] Another 'which code for EICR'..

2. C2 as live parts visible on 230V side of transformer and just taped up:

[ElectriciansForums.net] Another 'which code for EICR'..

3. Broken part on MCB.. C2? I feel less certain about this one. The MCB functions.

[ElectriciansForums.net] Another 'which code for EICR'..

4. Main Bonding disconnected to gas.. C2.. All gas pipes tested for continuity to MET and all had continuity.

[ElectriciansForums.net] Another 'which code for EICR'..

5. Main bonding not found for incoming water although water pipes showing continuity to MET. Only 1 bonding conductor in MET (10mm). The only 10mm in the house I could find was the one in the second picture bonding this random pipe in the house and then disappearing into the wall. Really not sure what to code this? The main bonding should be within 600mm and its easily accessible to do this, however the incoming pipe is plastic, but then immediately copper once in the property.

[ElectriciansForums.net] Another 'which code for EICR'.. [ElectriciansForums.net] Another 'which code for EICR'..

6. The consumer unit is absolutely packed and coated with dirt/plaster dust and I can hear it in the RCD and MCB mechanisms as I switch them (all functional though... for now!) Also getting poor IR results on L-E when conductors are all connected and MCB closed (0.08MΩ). When MCB's open (individually)this increases to over 10MΩ for all circuits, so perhaps plaster/grime etc making connection from busbar to E? 'Further investigation and/or consumer unit change C3 (maybe C2)

[ElectriciansForums.net] Another 'which code for EICR'..

Sorry for this lengthy one, I've done a handful of EICR's and have felt confident with the coding so far but not so much with this one!!
 

Attachments

  • [ElectriciansForums.net] Another 'which code for EICR'..
    MCB.jpg
    107.8 KB · Views: 65
  • [ElectriciansForums.net] Another 'which code for EICR'..
    Incoming water.jpg
    221.7 KB · Views: 62
  • [ElectriciansForums.net] Another 'which code for EICR'..
    bonding inside.jpg
    162.5 KB · Views: 58
Last edited:
i'd tend to agree with your codings there. maybe a C2 for the crap in the CU as you have no way of determining if the operation of the MCBs on overload is compromised by the grit etc.
 
Hi,

Don't do a lot of Domestic myself, but I would concur with your readings, and Tel ; I like your thoughts on the dust/grit.

Regards.
 
depending on where the location of the transformer is its boarder line C1 for me, exposed fuse , hate those qoe boards exploding rcbo's [ElectriciansForums.net] Another 'which code for EICR'.. all i did was press the test button and this happened C2 on them if they dont trip with my tester lol
 
I do like the way you spot these things.

I'm guessing you don't charge £50 for an in and out report. lol

No.. Just a bit more than that Murdoch :smiley2: (this one was £150), but I was there for 7 hours (plus another 2 writing up the report and covering letter with quotes). This particular house was extremely messy!
 
It looks like the 10mm loops at 'random pipe' and perhaps continues to disconnected gas clamp. Was thinking C3 for JB until I realised it's under the units!
 
It looks like the 10mm loops at 'random pipe' and perhaps continues to disconnected gas clamp. Was thinking C3 for JB until I realised it's under the units!

Just about to ask where the jb was

Sorry, should have been more clear. Both the transformer and JB are on top of the kitchen cabinets, with lots of junk stored around them.
 
C2 for potential danger in my book, leaning towards a C1 if customer is likely to be poking around up there.
 
Do you not use a software package to do this for you?

No I dont, I only do around 1 every couple of months. If I start doing more I would look at a software package to speed things up as I do take a while getting all the paperwork together.
 
It looks like the 10mm loops at 'random pipe' and perhaps continues to disconnected gas clamp. Was thinking C3 for JB until I realised it's under the units!

That may be the case, but somehwere along the line it may be connected to the water as well (as only one main bond in MET), but I cant be certain of that. I will code the disconnected gas bonding as a C2 and I think the 'unfound' water bonding as 'further investigation', as it may or may not be connected to the MET by a 10mm.

Thanks for the replies guys, I'm glad I was pretty much on the right lines.
 
No I dont, I only do around 1 every couple of months. If I start doing more I would look at a software package to speed things up as I do take a while getting all the paperwork together.

Do you do all your certs by hand? I too, only do the odd EICR but the time saving are from all the EIC's and MWC's
 
Do you do all your certs by hand? I too, only do the odd EICR but the time saving are from all the EIC's and MWC's

Yes, all by hand Murdoch.. It does take a while! What is the name of the software package you use?

Gosh.. I'm going to be all technologically advanced soon! Tazz is (very kindly) helping me with using excel for quoting and now the computer to fill out certs too!
 
Yes, all by hand Murdoch.. It does take a while! What is the name of the software package you use?

Gosh.. I'm going to be all technologically advanced soon! Tazz is (very kindly) helping me with using excel for quoting and now the computer to fill out certs too!

I use PIRform

PM me an email address and I'll send you some samples FYI
 
What would you guys do about the Main boding for the water then?

I had decided on 'further investigation', but if the incoming pipe is plastic does it need to have a main bond? I have tested the copper immediately after the plastic and somewhere along the line it is connected to the MET (approx 0.5Ω).

If the incomer was metal I would say I have to search more for the 10mm or run a new 10mm but it is plastic?
 
What would you guys do about the Main boding for the water then?

I had decided on 'further investigation', but if the incoming pipe is plastic does it need to have a main bond? I have tested the copper immediately after the plastic and somewhere along the line it is connected to the MET (approx 0.5Ω).

If the incomer was metal I would say I have to search more for the 10mm or run a new 10mm but it is plastic?
If the incomer is plastic and the rest of the installation is metal but does not go underground or get buried in walls then it is likely not extraneous, however if they have a boiler then the electrical earth connection to the boiler will almost certainly earth the water pipes and give you the low resistance reading.
 
At least who ever installed the JB's went to the effort of securing the wiring down with sticky pads and cable ties, a lot of sparks don't give a damn, shame he unnecessary snapped of the bottom part of the JB, although if the JB is fixed to the unit it would be a tough call if C2 or C3.
 

Reply to Another 'which code for EICR'.. in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Indeed it would be. But that would mean having 2 things to disconnect instead of one. More margin for error. Of course, any diligent spark would...
Replies
6
Views
516
loz2754
L
In the 80's I was taught that with PME earthing arrangements we used 16mm for the main earthing conductor, some went a bit crazy and were bonding...
Replies
11
Views
1K
`Just wasted an hour doing the same, and came to the same conclusions. 600mm is only mentioned in respect of gas meters from the 14th on, and is...
Replies
21
Views
4K
I agree, it's not an immediate danger so can't be a C2. Bad design though, so improvement recommended.
Replies
4
Views
3K
Some of the points should have been picked up by previous people doing the testing. Sounds like this is a thorough report. Not everything is...
Replies
11
Views
2K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks