Resistivity equations

T

The Ghost

• Dec 2, 2017

• #2

 

Upvote 0 Downvote

OP

Gary Tollison

-

Joined

Jun 13, 2017

Messages

87

Reaction score

47

Location

Peterborough

• Dec 2, 2017

• #3

thanks for the reply.

I know how to get the resistivity with a known CSA, my problem is I cant work out how to calculate the CSA of the cable, when the CSA is unknown.

 

Upvote 0 Downvote

T

The Ghost

• Dec 2, 2017

• #4

You are normally given the CSA in a question, or as you say you could not work out the answer. Ok sorry just seen its a reverse question. Silly me. So reverse engineer the figures.

 

Last edited by a moderator: Dec 2, 2017

Upvote 0 Downvote

OP

Gary Tollison

-

Joined

Jun 13, 2017

Messages

87

Reaction score

47

Location

Peterborough

• Dec 2, 2017

• #5

Vortigern said:

You are normally given the CSA in a question, or as you say you could not work out the answer. Ok sorry just seen its a reverse question. Silly me. So reverse engineer the figures.

Click to expand...

 

Upvote 0 Downvote

Simonslimline

-

Arms

Joined

Jan 13, 2013

Messages

2,195

Reaction score

1,081

Location

South West, Bath

• Dec 2, 2017

• #6

use ohms law to work out Ohms. V/I

I then used the formula and put a Value for CSA in that is not known yet.

I will, give you a clue, It is less than 10mm2.

I expect there is any easier way though.

 

Upvote 0 Downvote

marconi

-

Mentor

Arms

Supporter

Joined

Feb 8, 2015

Messages

3,107

Reaction score

4,946

Location

London United Kingdom

• Dec 2, 2017

• #7

You are given the formula R = rho x l/csa.

One has to re-arrange this formula to put your unknown, the csa = ...

The trick is to do the same thing to both sides of the equality (=).

So, csa x R = csa x rho x l/csa which can be re-arranged on the right hand side to:

rho x l x csa/csa. But csa/csa = 1.

One can now write csa x R = rho x l

Use the same trick again but this time divide both sides by R to arrive at csa = ...

I leave you to finish it off.

 

Upvote 0 Downvote

Wilko

-

Arms

V.Nearly Esteemed

Joined

Jul 28, 2016

Messages

6,245

Reaction score

7,157

Location

Berkshire

• Dec 2, 2017

• #8

Did they stuff up the units for resistivity in the question(?) - should be rho in Ohm.meter, as per @Vortigern post, iirc .

 

Last edited: Dec 2, 2017

Upvote 0 Downvote

happysteve

-

Broke Internet

Arms

Supporter

Joined

Sep 24, 2013

Messages

1,514

Reaction score

2,420

Location

Nottingham

• Dec 2, 2017

• #9

Wilko said:

Did they stuff up the units for resistivity in the question(?) - should be rho in Ohm.meter, as per @Vortigern post, iirc .

Click to expand...

They usually do. I keep sending corrections to C&G...

 

Upvote 0 Downvote

Lucien Nunes

-

Mentor

Esteemed

Arms

Joined

Jul 2, 2013

Messages

6,778

Reaction score

14,809

Location

London for the time being

• Dec 2, 2017

• #10

I don't know what that page is an extract from but it trips over this a couple of times. The resistance of a one-metre cube of copper isn't any number of Ω⋅m, then when they do mean Ω⋅m they call it ohms per metre. Doesn't anybody check this stuff before printing (could that be another 'replica' like the dodgy BS7671s?). People don't make these mistakes in daily life ('I'll have half a minute of potatoes and two dozen per-egg-squared please') so it's a bit poor that they crop up so often in supposedly technical stuff.

Marconi gives the right strategy - rearrange the formulas you have, and/or substitute into one another until you have your unknown in terms of your known values. You can also substitute V=IR into it so that you have only one equation to solve, that takes in all the data given in the question and spits out the CSA. But, if you find that too abstract, you can calculate in stages. i.e. you know the voltage drop and current, so you can calculate the resistance, and once you know that you can use it and the resistivity and length to calculate the CSA. Sometimes knowing the solution of the intermediate steps is helpful because it can show up mistakes, or feed other parts of a multi-part question.

 

Upvote 0 Downvote

D

Drew34

• Dec 2, 2017

• #11

Have a look at transposition of formulas mate. It's evil but necessary

 

Upvote 0 Downvote

Loki

-

Nearly Esteemed

Arms

Joined

Oct 11, 2014

Messages

575

Reaction score

710

Location

Devon

• Dec 3, 2017

• #12

I find using the diagonal method the easiest.

r = pl
-----
a

So in this case you want to find a (csa)

The pl would move diagonally across to become:

r = a
----
pl



If you wanted l then you would use the same technique:

r = pl
-----
a


Move p below r

r = l
---- ----
p a



Now a move across diagonally to r leaving l on its own

ra = l
-----
p



Hope this posts keeping the format as its done on my mobile

 

Last edited: Dec 3, 2017

Upvote 0 Downvote

Loki

-

Nearly Esteemed

Arms

Joined

Oct 11, 2014

Messages

575

Reaction score

710

Location

Devon

• Dec 3, 2017

• #13

Nope it didn't lol

So here's a couple pics

 

Upvote 0 Downvote

AJshep

-

Arms

Joined

Nov 23, 2017

Messages

668

Reaction score

751

Location

South East, England

• Dec 3, 2017

• #14

Quite a long time since I did this so i could be way off but are you sure it's not

a= pl/r

If I were to break It down..

Step 1. (Move "a" over the equals sign to the top of the equation) so you end up with.

ra=pl

Step 2 (move "r" over the equals sign so it ends up at the bottom of the equation e.g. divide instead of multiply)

a=pl/r

 

Last edited: Dec 3, 2017

Upvote 0 Downvote

telectrix

-

Mentor

Nearly Esteemed

Arms

Joined

Sep 5, 2010

Messages

73,534

Reaction score

71,830

Location

cheshire/staffordshire

• Dec 3, 2017

• #15

transposition of formulae is easy if you just bear in mind that you can do anything like add, subtract,multiply, or divide .just ensure that wtatever you do, do it to both sides of the equation. e.g. if you divide the right side by x, then divide the left side by x. both are then still equal.

 

Upvote 0 Downvote