Advice on work I've had done | Page 4 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Advice on work I've had done in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Joined
Jul 25, 2019
Messages
7
Reaction score
5
Location
UK
Hello,

I've recently had some outside lights fitted, there is about 10 of them, all LED. The electricans took the cable from the fuse board down into my basement void where other services are running and then out to the garden. Outside they have used armoured cable, 1.5mm, about 20-30meters in total I'd have thought. But in the basement void, it's about another 20m from the fuseboard end to the outside but they have used a 0.75mm 3 core white flex cable.

The circuit breaker is 6 amps.

I don't know whether that is good or bad but to me something isn't quite sitting right having a cable half the size of the armoured cable, it looks like they've used a cable very similar to the flex hanging down on my pendants for 20m.

Should I be concerned or is it ok? Since I have had the work done I've been hearing bad things about the company I used so I was hoping someone on here could give me some advice.

Thank you.
 
I have had a long trawl through the relevant sections of the BBB and cannot see anything which specifically prevents the use of a flexible cable of 0.75mm csa. None of the above, including the voltimum statement supersede what it actually states in table 52.3. It clearly states that for any purpose other than a specific appliance or ELV the minimum is 0.75mm. However if anyone else can definitely show otherwise I'll accept my interpretation is wrong
 
As its been said before, the wording in the table is poorly written and should be clearer.

If one looks at the tables for ccc, the one for flexible cables has no installation methods, unlike that for insulated & sheathed flat cable; granted there are other tables for reference methods to determine ccc.

52.3 specifically mentions lighting & power circuits insulated & sheathed cables, but then doesn't for flexible cables. Why doesn't it just say for any other application for both cable types?
 
Well I don't often disagree with @westward10 but I think @happysteve has it with this one.

Table 52.3 is very clear. You don't just jump to the 'lighting circuits' part of the table. You HAVE to start at the beginning and work your way through a table. Therefore 0.75mm is acceptable in this scenario, however much we all dislike the idea.

edit.... although I met it doesn't meet the voltage drop requirements!
 
Last edited:
Well I'm sure the OP is none the wiser after this one.

I'd probably say it is OK as well. The lights are permanent LED fittings, it is not as if they are ceiling rose pendants and the low wattage bulbs can be replaced by old style incandescent bulbs.
 
Well I don't often disagree with @westward10 but I think @happysteve has it with this one.

Table 52.3 is very clear. You don't just jump to the 'lighting circuits' part of the table. You HAVE to start at the beginning and work your way through a table. Therefore 0.75mm is acceptable in this scenario, however much we all dislike the idea.

edit.... although I met it doesn't meet the voltage drop requirements!
what are you on HHD? have you been to a wholesalers lately and asked for a 100M drum of 0.75mm2 T and E with lots of qualified Sparkies' in attendance waiting for their free coffee?
 
Last edited:
Well I'm sure the OP is none the wiser after this one.

I'd probably say it is OK as well. The lights are permanent LED fittings, it is not as if they are ceiling rose pendants and the low wattage bulbs can be replaced by old style incandescent bulbs.
We do tend to get a bit carried away don't we. Poor old OP doesn't know which way to turn, and also doesn't even know what OP means, so doesn't even know we're talking about him!
 
Away from the discussion about 1mm or 0.75mm, who or what sort of person would wire the garden lights in 1.5mm3 SWA cable, and then lash it on to a length of 0.75mm2 flex, answers on a post card please.
[ElectriciansForums.net] Advice on work I've had done
 
Interesting discussion,I have my opinion and it agrees with one of the competing views :)

Where I see a problem is with the op in his opening post describing the cable as they have used a 0.75mm 3 core white flex cable.

He is extra observant or meticulous with his estimate of flexible cable size because on the one hand he asks question of regulations and on the other hand he is better than me at sizing the difference between a 1.0mm flex and 0.75mm flex in situ

Something does not seem to add up,the story does not seem to be fully disclosed,it could very well have been 1.0mm flex from the outset :)
 
Last edited:
Interesting discussion,I have my opinion and it agrees with one of the competing views :)

Where I see a problem is with the op in his opening post describing the cable as they have used a 0.75mm 3 core white flex cable.

He is extra observant or meticulous with his estimate of flexible cable size because on the one hand he asks question of regulations and on the other hand he is better than me at sizing the difference in a 1.omm and 0.75 flex in situ
Something does not seem to add up,the story does not seem to be fully disclosed
It may say the size of the cable on the flex......but you could be right in what your thinking
 
I think what we can all agree on is, though not unsafe, it appears (assuming what the OP says is accurate) to be a bit of a bodge job. Without the full details and any pictures this is my personal opinion.
My advise to the OP is to get a honest second opinion from another qualified spark.
 
I think what we can all agree on is, though not unsafe, it appears (assuming what the OP says is accurate) to be a bit of a bodge job. Without the full details and any pictures this is my personal opinion.
My advise to the OP is to get a honest second opinion from another qualified spark.
I think a bodge job might be a bit strong description a bit orthodox maybe. Is it unsafe I don't think so but as posted without pictures it is hard to tell.
 
Interesting discussion,I have my opinion and it agrees with one of the competing views :)

Where I see a problem is with the op in his opening post describing the cable as they have used a 0.75mm 3 core white flex cable.

He is extra observant or meticulous with his estimate of flexible cable size because on the one hand he asks question of regulations and on the other hand he is better than me at sizing the difference between a 1.0mm flex and 0.75mm flex in situ

Something does not seem to add up,the story does not seem to be fully disclosed,it could very well have been 1.0mm flex from the outset :)

It says 0.75 on the cable, as well as some other letters and numbers.

I've been trying to get hold of the company but not had any luck, I said about the certificate and apparently he needs to come and take some details of the fuse board but doesn't have time to do it at the moment...apparently.

Anyway, I've arranged for another person to come and have a look at the work that's been done, when I told them about the 0.75mm cable they didn't seem impressed.
 

Reply to Advice on work I've had done in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar threads

  • Question
I would use the Switch & Load 16A - https://www.quickwire.co.uk/product/switch-load-16a/ Designed to do the same thing as the ceiling rose in...
Replies
5
Views
719
I can't help wondering about earthing arrangements and how important aesthetics really are when attempting to make the best of a less than ideal...
2
Replies
21
Views
1K
nicebutdim
N

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top