63 amp socket Table 41.1 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss 63 amp socket Table 41.1 in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Cookie

-
Joined
Jul 11, 2019
Messages
675
Reaction score
126
Location
Earth
Does anyone know why 0.4 seconds was extended to 63 amp socket circuits? Is this because supply sources are getting stronger?

[ElectriciansForums.net] 63 amp socket Table 41.1
 
I think they are trying to bring protection for 63A sockets in line with the requirements for socket outlets of lower current ratings. Same with the RCD requirements changing.

Unless there's another reason anyone else is aware of.
 
Guess so, but I can't see the danger being more or less for a fixed 63 amp device vs one on a plug.
Danger is more for plugged devices due to the flex used.

Fixed loads are usually installed via flexi conduit, armoured cable or similar heavy duty cables.

Plugged in devices usually end up with fairly unprotected trailing leads.
 
In my world there's lots of things that are a final circuit (device) on a 63A ceeform, both 1ph and 3ph, so in that sense it makes, er, sense. But then that exact same cable can plug into and power a submain (rubber box distro's) and become a 5s circuit, so it's all about having a thought-through approach.
 
Danger is more for plugged devices due to the flex used.

Fixed loads are usually installed via flexi conduit, armoured cable or similar heavy duty cables.

Plugged in devices usually end up with fairly unprotected trailing leads.


I guess that means added impedance increasing disconnection times?
 
I guess that means added impedance increasing disconnection times?
No,

Likelihood of damage to cables.

Rcd are for the protection of persons, not equipment.

Trailing leads, associated generally with plugged in equipment tend to get damaged exposing cores, or potential short circuits.

An example may be a 63A welding set, loads of steel plate being moved around, and potential for dropping plate sharp edge-on to the welder supply cable.

Fixed equipment tends not to be like this.
 
No,

Likelihood of damage to cables.

Rcd are for the protection of persons, not equipment.

Trailing leads, associated generally with plugged in equipment tend to get damaged exposing cores, or potential short circuits.

An example may be a 63A welding set, loads of steel plate being moved around, and potential for dropping plate sharp edge-on to the welder supply cable.

Fixed equipment tends not to be like this.

To me that would mandate RCDs instead of reduced disconnection, but what do I know? ?
 

Reply to 63 amp socket Table 41.1 in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
309
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
832
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
930

Similar threads

I made some adaptor plugs up when Maplins closed down, I got a job lot of insulated 4mm banana sockets for a few quid and made up a full range...
Replies
1
Views
476
When I first started, I stripped out a house for a rewire and got my hands on a switch with an inlay and transparent cover. Filled it in with...
Replies
6
Views
412

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top