Circuit Wire For Long Run | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Circuit Wire For Long Run in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Cookie

-
Joined
Jul 11, 2019
Messages
675
Reaction score
118
Location
Earth
Ok, say you've got a lighting run with the last fixture being 1,280 meters away. 1,800 watts per phase 3 phase, 277/480Y volts though in this example we can use 230/400Y for the ease of discussion.

My question is- what size wire do I run for each phase and earth? What disconnection time do I use? Do I use a Type B, C or D breaker? What should my max R1+R2 come out to be?





[ElectriciansForums.net] Circuit Wire For Long Run
 
Street lighting would be an example in which the REC uses a concentric cable looping of the main ring supply cable.
Theres loads of software to calculate size required to local cutout in each fixture.
 
I suspect this is a specialised case as above.

But...if you simply followed the UK domestic requirements for 3% drop and assuming the lights are spaced sort-of uniformly, the feed cable comes out at 25mm, for 5% drop (reasonable for a case like this with LED or similar lights that are not that voltage-sensitive) it is 16mm. Risers to each lamp could be much smaller of course!

As a final circuit you would be looking at 0.4s disconnection so a B or C curve breaker. With a lot of simultaneously-switched lights (central control) then probably a C-curve for that and 10A C-curve MCB has max Zs of 1.75 ohms.

Assuming 4C 16mm with armour as CPC, then R1 = 1.15 mOhm/m, and R2 = 3.1 mOhm/m so your R1+R2 = 5.4 ohms which is too much, as would 5C cable as well (2.9 ohm). In this case I would probably put on a 100mA instant RCD to meet disconnection, as then still selective if the main DB has a 300mA delay incomer for fire reasons, etc.

But I don't design street lighting, so the above might be complete nonsense!
 
I suspect this is a specialised case as above.

But...if you simply followed the UK domestic requirements for 3% drop and assuming the lights are spaced sort-of uniformly, the feed cable comes out at 25mm, for 5% drop (reasonable for a case like this with LED or similar lights that are not that voltage-sensitive) it is 16mm. Risers to each lamp could be much smaller of course!

As a final circuit you would be looking at 0.4s disconnection so a B or C curve breaker. With a lot of simultaneously-switched lights (central control) then probably a C-curve for that and 10A C-curve MCB has max Zs of 1.75 ohms.

Assuming 4C 16mm with armour as CPC, then R1 = 1.15 mOhm/m, and R2 = 3.1 mOhm/m so your R1+R2 = 5.4 ohms which is too much, as would 5C cable as well (2.9 ohm). In this case I would probably put on a 100mA instant RCD to meet disconnection, as then still selective if the main DB has a 300mA delay incomer for fire reasons, etc.

But I don't design street lighting, so the above might be complete nonsense!


Thnaks, but I don't want to use an RCD for disconnection. RCDs can fail and all disconnection in TN systems must be done by the breaker (MCB) itself.
 
Thnaks, but I don't want to use an RCD for disconnection. RCDs can fail and all disconnection in TN systems must be done by the breaker (MCB) itself.
If the lights are separately switched (e.g. each has its own photocell) you could get away with a 10A B-curve MCB fine as no massive inrush surge. That would allow you to meet the disconnection with 5-core 16mm (£9.37/m from Superlec) or just 4-core 25mm cable (£9.24/m).

1280m * 4-core 16mm at £6.84/m = £8,755 + RCD
1280m * 4-core 25mm at £9.24/m = £11,827
1280m * 5-core 16mm at £9.37/m = £11,994 (easier to wrangle, more reliable earth)

Of course that difference probably is trivial compared to the project cost.
 
Last edited:
If the lights are separately switched (e.g. each has its own photocell) you could get away with a 10A B-curve MCB fine as no massive inrush surge. That would allow you to meet the disconnection with 5-core 16mm (£9.37/m from Superlec) or just 4-core 25mm cable (£9.24/m).

1280m * 4-core 16mm at £6.84/m = £8,755 + RCD
1280m * 4-core 25mm at £9.24/m = £11,827
1280m * 5-core 16mm at £9.37/m = £11,994 (easier to wrangle, more reliable earth)

Of course that difference probably is trivial compared to the project cost.

Right, but a trip and reclose from then utility would engage all of them at once I think.

Do you have the ohms value for each conductor?
 
Last page of this has both conductors and armour resistances:

Yes, if you had a supply interruption at night it might well power all lamps simultaneously. I know some UPS allow random-timed start-up to avoid that sort of issue, no idea if there is a similar idea for lamps to get round the inrush problem without having to push the MCB trip point up.

Which you can do, just it gets very difficult/expensive for the cable if you do it that way and still want to meet the required disconnection Zs at the end of a long cable.

If your lights were in a region so they could be ring-connected that would reduce the max Zs value (and drop as well, of course).

Or you live with the RCD to avoid the Zs limit of the MCB being an issue and put in two in series for redundancy, accepting they don't have selectivity so both need reset on fault.

But as mentioned at the start, there probably are folks/companies/tools that specialise in street light solution. I'm just guessing!
 
Last edited:
Also to add if the supply is not RCD protected (so no selectivity issues) you could even use a 300mA delay RCD, still meet the 0.4s disconnection time for shock, and be pretty robust against false trips.

So you could have a 300mA delay then a 100mA instant and retain selectivity unless the 100mA fails.
 
Does BS7671 allow an RCD to meet disconnection times in TN? I just can't bring myself to do it.
It allows it but I would normally see it as poor practice unless there are no reasonable alternatives.

With over 1km of cable going to something as big as 35mm to get MCB disconnection and good inrush tolerance is pushing cost and assembly/repair effort up massively, so it moves towards "no reasonable alternative" territory.

It is possibly worth looking at other aspect normally taken for granted. For example the usual Zs limits allow a 0.8 factor for cable heating - that is not an issue for a heavy cable needed to meet VD when very long.

While usually seen as old fashioned, sometimes it is worth considering fuses (e.g. switched-fuse feed) as they often have a better combination of surge handling and Zs limit. Also one fuse blowing means you still have 2 out of 3 lights on!
 
Last edited:
Here are some examples for SWA data and for various OCPD assuming no significant cable heating and 1280m length:
OCPD​
Zs (from OSG)​
Zs No heating (Ohm)​
R1+R2 (mOhm/m)​
10A BS88-2 fuse​
3.7​
4.63​
3.61​
10A B-MCB​
3.5​
4.38​
3.42​
16A B-MCB​
2.2​
2.75​
2.15​
16A BS88-2 fuse​
1.9​
2.38​
1.86​
10A C-MCB​
1.75​
2.19​
1.71​
SWA choice​
R1​
R2​
R1+R2 (mOhm/m)​
16mm 4C​
1.15​
3.1​
4.25​
16mm 5C​
1.15​
1.15​
2.30​
25mm 4C​
0.727​
2.3​
3.03​
25mm 4C + 16mm​
0.727​
1.15​
1.88​
25mm 5C​
0.727​
0.727​
1.45​
 
Last edited:
Your 1.8kW/phase is about 8A, so 10A or more OCPD should be fine, subject to inrush limits.

If you control inrush then the 10A B-curve MCB is OK and it needs cable below 3.42 mOhm/m so all examples except 16mm 4C are fine.

If you used a 16A B-MCB for more inrush tolerance then it is 2.15 mOhm/m, so either 25mm 4-core and a supplementary 16mm earth, or 25mm 5-core is needed, etc.
 
Last edited:
Should also add that I have not included and Ze or Zs at DB in the above table, assuming it is quite small for this discussion.

Equally you might just be lucky and find the lamp-posts are having 10-20 ohms when in the ground resulting in a small reduction in the R2 value.

I also did not do the parallel CPC & armour calculation as usually the regs assume the worst-case of the better conductor being used. Unless explicitly paralleled and then it is often assumed they are all similar conductors.

So there are possible factors making it better or worse!
 

OCPD​
Zs (from OSG)​
Zs No heating (Ohm)​
R1+R2 (mOhm/m)​
10A BS88-2 fuse​
3.7​
4.63​
3.61​
10A B-MCB​
3.5​
4.38​
3.42​
16A B-MCB​
2.2​
2.75​
2.15​
16A BS88-2 fuse​
1.9​
2.38​
1.86​
10A C-MCB​
1.75​
2.19​
1.71​
SWA choice​
R1​
R2​
R1+R2 (mOhm/m)​
16mm 4C​
1.15​
3.1​
4.25​
16mm 5C​
1.15​
1.15​
2.30​
25mm 4C​
0.727​
2.3​
3.03​
25mm 4C + 16mm​
0.727​
1.15​
1.88​
25mm 5C​
0.727​
0.727​
1.45​


By any chance, would you know the max Zs for this 15 amp MCB?

 
Looking at the data sheet, and applying the UK regulation's approach but with USA value, it would be:
  • Max current for 0.4s trip time = 30 * In (slightly less, but that is marked on horizontal scale) so that = 30 * 15A = 450A
  • Assuming you are looking at the USA supply of 277V nominal line-neutral and that is +/-10% then the lowest supply is 277 * 0.9 = 249V
  • So max Zs = 249V / 450A = 0.55 ohms
  • As for the table I did earlier, I am not applying the typical 0.8 factor for hot cable resistance compared to cold design/test values.
That is about 4 times lower than the European style of B-curve MCB would require, and that puts you cable size up massively! Assuming copper and matching CPC, that is no more than 0.27 ohms per conductor, and over 1280m that is 0.215 mOhm/m so you are looking at 3/0 AWG!

Realistically if you are faced with that sort of a breaker curve I would be looking at putting in a high quality RCD of 300mA or even up to 5A trip point as it would deliver far faster disconnection in the event of an earth fault, not having inrush trip risk, and allowing a sane cable size based on 5% VD of something like #5 AWG copper.
 
Last edited:
As mentioned before, two RCD in series could be used for "no single point of failure" and even at the $1k MCCB style pricing it is going to work out cheaper than that extra copper (and the time & effort to install and terminate it).
 
Looking at the data sheet, and applying the UK regulation's approach but with USA value, it would be:
  • Max current for 0.4s trip time = 30 * In (slightly less, but that is marked on horizontal scale) so that = 30 * 15A = 450A
  • Assuming you are looking at the USA supply of 277V nominal line-phase and that is +/-10% then the lowest supply is 277 * 0.9 = 249V
  • So max Zs = 249V / 450A = 0.55 ohms
  • As for the table I did earlier, I am not applying the typical 0.8 factor for hot cable resistance compared to cold design/test values.
That is about 4 times lower than the European style of B-curve MCB would require, and that puts you cable size up massively! Assuming copper and matching CPC, that is no more than 0.27 ohms per conductor, and over 1280m that is 0.215 mOhm/m so you are looking at 3/0 AWG!

Realistically if you are faced with that sort of a breaker curve I would be looking at putting in a high quality RCD of 300mA or even up to 5A trip point as it would deliver far faster disconnection in the event of an earth fault, not having inrush trip risk, and allowing a sane cable size based on 5% VD of something like #5 AWG copper.


Pure awesome! Though I would use -5% instead of -10% but it works either way.

Yup, I noticed that two. US breakers keep giving me a much lower Zs which kept throwing me off. Still confuses me to be honest. Basically most US breakers are a type E of F, if such a category existed after type D lol.


3/0 is a massive amount of copper. I'm basically calculating voltage rings around the post in hopes of being able to get away with a longer disconnecting time based on lower hand to foot voltage than 138 volts:

[ElectriciansForums.net] Circuit Wire For Long Run



For your calcs, are you using 30*C or 75*C for the AWG wire system?
 
Pure awesome! Though I would use -5% instead of -10% but it works either way.
The UK voltage tolerance is +10% / -6% but the calculations are actually on 0.95 so -5% of nominal. However Aus/NZ seems to use the nominal cases so is more "optimistic".

What is actually applied would depend on local code/regulations but I have no idea of the details of USA policy.
Yup, I noticed that two. US breakers keep giving me a much lower Zs which kept throwing me off. Still confuses me to be honest. Basically most US breakers are a type E of F, if such a category existed after type D lol.
That seems to be the case, though to be fair the EU range of MCCB also come with that style (basically fixed magnetic trip point for the family, but different thermal curves) as well as ones more like MCB with the "instant" magnetic point being at a fixed ratio to 'In'.

As well as the fancy but expensive ones with adjustable electronic trip up to the very high energy-limiting magnetic "last resort" trip.
3/0 is a massive amount of copper. I'm basically calculating voltage rings around the post in hopes of being able to get away with a longer disconnecting time based on lower hand to foot voltage than 138 volts:
With local rods you have no real hope of safe disconnection or protection, unless very deep and wet. Having a CPC is far safer but adds cost, though if you can use SWA armour and still disconnect it is not really making a difference to project cable cost (assuming armoured is used).

But from above it looks like an RCD is needed in any case to deal with that sort of length, even though it is not an RCD for direct-touch shock itself.
For your calcs, are you using 30*C or 75*C for the AWG wire system?
I assume 30C (i.e. cold, as measured), just got the AWG size & resistance from Wikipedia!
 
Last edited:

Reply to Circuit Wire For Long Run in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

  • Question
I appreciate the input on this. I decided it is not a good idea, and will spend the money and time to install a new dedicated circuit with...
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Question
This contactor you suggested unfortunately only has two NO switches rather than 1 NC and 1 NO required for the CR3 current sensing bypass...
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Question
CONCLUSION (Couldn't see how to edit title) It was not belting it down with rain today, so lifted the manhole cover. The pump is about 2 metres...
2
Replies
45
Views
5K
  • Question
Hi There How did you get on with your basement project?
Replies
1
Views
971
  • Question
BS3871 type 3's have a similar shaped operating curve to BS60898 type C's. Any fault that will meet the disconnection time of 5s (for 63A...
Replies
5
Views
2K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks