EICR Remedial Works evidence | on ElectriciansForums

NICEIC Certification Scheme EICR Remedial Works evidence

Discuss EICR Remedial Works evidence in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

FreeBeam

DIY
Joined
Nov 10, 2021
Messages
3
Reaction score
3
Location
Leeds
Hi all,

Newbie here and looking for some advice and confirmation. We are planning to rent out our home and have completed EICR through the agents. The EICR came back with a few C2.

240v fan in shower cubicle C2
Socket backbox damaged in lounge C2
Socket backbox damaged in hallway C2
IP of boiler spur C2
IP of garage socket C2
Connection of kitchen downlights not enclosed C2

The quote came out to be ÂŁ455 to fix the above C2s from the same company carrying out the EICR. I am not sure if this is reasonable but my question is about the remedial works itself.

The same company completed the remedial works and has issued a cover letter stating that works have been done quoting a reference to each C2 and now the overall assessment is "Satisfactory" with a reference number to the EICR. The cover letter does not have any name, stamp, signature but just company's address on the top right. Is it an acceptable type of evidence for the remedial works? Or do we need to some standard certificate or signed paper?

Thanks
 
soulds OK. you have the EICR and evidence to show that the faults have been rectified.

I do, however, disagree with someof those codings. e.g. a 240V fan ina showere enclosure is perfectly
comliant as long as the IP rating is IPX4 or better.

damaged back boxes a C2 if there's a potential danger evident. if not, then a C3 is the right coding

Those IP ratings, can't say without seeing.


downlight connections unenclosed is only a C3.

ÂŁ455 seems excessive for that half day's work.
 
Never known a boiler switch needing to be IP rated unless it’s outside.
Same with garage socket, unless inside of garage is likely to get wet (spray washing inside?)

Too late now to do anything, but photographs of the issues before being sorted would have maybe brought up discrepancies.
 
Never known a boiler switch needing to be IP rated unless it’s outside.
Same with garage socket, unless inside of garage is likely to get wet (spray washing inside?)

Too late now to do anything, but photographs of the issues before being sorted would have maybe brought up discrepancies.
Could have cable entry in top or bottom too big maybe, but I’d expect the inspector to say this.
 
The codings seem ok to me. Also the paperwork will be acceptable.

I normally do a statement of fact fo4 landlords stating what has been don3 to rectify any issues stating that if an EICR where to be now done a satisfactory result would be gained as long as no other issues have arisen since the report was done.
however this is not required. It’s what I do.

the price. Does seem far too high for half a day in Leeds.
unless There was more to the extractor job than swapping fo4 a higher IP rated one.

half day labour ÂŁ150- ÂŁ200
materials ÂŁ 50- ÂŁ100

total ÂŁ200-ÂŁ300
obviously there may be more to this than I am seeing.
was the property empty or inhabited. Are the tenants accommodating? Are the issues accessible within the property.
£455 does seem excessive but if there are access issues…...
How much was the EICR?
 
Never known a boiler switch needing to be IP rated unless it’s outside.
Same with garage socket, unless inside of garage is likely to get wet (spray washing inside?)

Too late now to do anything, but photographs of the issues before being sorted would have maybe brought up discrepancies.
It will be finger access IP. Only needs to be IP20 doesn't it? That still allows a very large hole, especially if it's already partly filled with a cable.
 
Never known a boiler switch needing to be IP rated unless it’s outside.
Same with garage socket, unless inside of garage is likely to get wet (spray washing inside?)

Too late now to do anything, but photographs of the issues before being sorted would have maybe brought up discrepancies.

Don't forget, 'IP rated' does not mean waterproof. Although a lot of people seem to use it in that manner.
 
If the inspector thought a 230v extractor fan was a C2 his only course to rectify that would be a 12volt fan which could involve more work than immediately seems, and hence higher price for both materials and labour.
OP shouldn't be paying out money because of the inspector's incompetence.
 
Thanks, everyone for the response. Really appreciated. Below a few pictures from my records (Not provided by the electrician)
1) Extractor fan, no coring was involved, simple replacement.
2) Sockets were slightly tilted, not sure if anything was broken at the back.
3) Ditto
4) Boiler siwtch, not IP rated so fair comment. The garage is fully covered by the way.
5) Same as Boilder so fair comment. The garage is fully covered by the way.
6) Dont know what is it.

Like I said, may be too expensive but didn't want the hassle hence paid the Contractor.

If a remedial report without a signature/name/stamp is acceptable then I have no issues. I am a bit surprised that something without a sign/stamp is allowed for such an important job.
 

Attachments

  • [ElectriciansForums.net] EICR Remedial Works evidence
    1. 240v Fan in Shower Cubicle C2.jpg
    48.3 KB · Views: 31
  • [ElectriciansForums.net] EICR Remedial Works evidence
    2. Socket Damage Louge C2.jpg
    25.5 KB · Views: 29
  • [ElectriciansForums.net] EICR Remedial Works evidence
    3. Socket Damage Hallway C2.jpg
    64.1 KB · Views: 31
  • [ElectriciansForums.net] EICR Remedial Works evidence
    4. IP of Boiler Spur C2.jpg
    97.2 KB · Views: 32
I would just like to clarify that a quote was provided and we accepted it so inspector is not at fault. It should have been up to us to check and verify or query the quote before accepting.

The purpose of my post was to understand the process involved in the remedial works. Sharing the cost and defects was only for other members who may go through the same process and would benefit from it.
 
1) Extractor fan, no coring was involved, simple replacement.
Confused! If the inspector thought a 230v fan was a C2 and it was a simple replacement, it could only have been replaced with a 230v model which in the inspectors eyes is still a C2!!!
 

Reply to EICR Remedial Works evidence in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
223
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
683
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
625

Similar threads

Here the BPG#4 is useful, it is not a statutory document at all, but it provides good guidance as to what can reasonably considered as C1/C2/C3...
Replies
11
Views
1K
With all due respect, if you're in a position, trained and skilled to be undertaking these works, you should really know this stuff. Especially as...
Replies
10
Views
1K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top