Dodgy trade pictures for your amusement! - 1 Million Views! | Page 224 | on ElectriciansForums
Click here to remove these ads

Dodgy trade pictures for your amusement! - 1 Million Views!

Post new thread

Discuss Dodgy trade pictures for your amusement! - 1 Million Views! in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Darkwood

Darkwood

Arms
Joined
Jun 15, 2009
Messages
13,711
Reaction score
10,231
Location
West Yorkshire
Right ... Just been nudged to set this up by Paul.M and sounds a good idea following recent threads I've done in the Arms..

Rules....No Offensive material... edit if required before posting as this is the public arena.
Anything to do with the trade or in and around it ...H&S pic's welcome.

[ElectriciansForums.net] Dodgy trade pictures for your amusement! - 1 Million Views!

I've posted this a few times and this is at a mates house following a kitchen refirb several yrs ago. :eek:mg_smile:

[ElectriciansForums.net] Dodgy trade pictures for your amusement! - 1 Million Views!
 
Sort by date Sort by votes
Raptor0014 said:
When I rang NAPIT
Click to expand...
Last week NAPIT told me "not to worry" about an RCD taking 0.5 seconds to trip due to a PV system back-feeding and not shutting down very quickly.
There are some good technical people in NAPIT but I find them a bit hit and miss.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
timhoward said:
As a B32 wouldn't trip at all with a load of ~46 amps, the question is how hot does the 6mm get for the duration of the shower.
It would trip after roughly 15 minutes with a 50A load.
We need someone to plug an EV into the other side of the socket!

I agree that angle needs exploring, what requires a dedicated circuit. Appendix 15 comes to mind, but I don't have book here.
Click to expand...

I don't think Appendix 15 would cover showers.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Julie. said:
However, open question to everyone, just what exactly would be wrong with taking a socket outlet off the shower circuit (or anything else such as ufh, or similar); if electrically it had the usual stuff right such as rcd, Zs within limits etc.

General question on people's thoughts about this.
Click to expand...
If it is electrically sound then to me the problem it sort of violates the "principle of least surprise" in that you might have a lone socket that is still powered when someone thinks they have isolated the RFC/radials related to that.

Yes, you should never assume and always do your safe isolation tests, but we know that is often missing in any DIY work, etc.

A cooker outlet socket is clearly related to the cooker feed, so no problem there.

The odd radial or conversion from other use has that, but usually there the CU would be labelled with its new use. Yes, you laddie! Stop laughing at the back!!!
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
westward10 said:
If NAPIT or any scheme for that matter say it is okay then there is your answer, it probably isn't okay.
Click to expand...
I’m not sure you can make a sweeping statement like that.

I’ve not had any issues with NAPIT and always found them to be quite helpful. Even explaining things in detail for me when I ask ‘why’ to help me understand what they’re saying if it’s not immediately obvious.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Raptor0014 said:
You can’t run a 2.5mm spur from a 32A 6mm shower.

Not matter what the Zs is. The cable is only rated at max 27A.

So unless you ran it in 6mm, which would be some effort for a 2g socket 😂 then it’s not going to be compliant.
Click to expand...
Nope, 2.5mm^2 would be fine, the maximum load could only be 26A max for a double socket outlet, and realistically 20A , so some if not most installation methods would have the capacity, exactly the same as a spur off a RFC.

Would not have to be 6, or 4mm^2, and if it was a single socket or FCU probably 1.5mm^2 would be ok from a load perspective.

I ask the question, because one's initial thought is to object, but is it actually wrong?

I know it's unusual and unexpected, but perhaps more compliant and less unexpected than some things we see!
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
App. 15 recommends keeping cookers >2kW and other similar loads (heating etc) off ring finals, to avoid overloading either leg of the ring.

It's badly worded though, and often taken out of context, leading to the pseudo-reg that all such loads should be their own dedicated circuit.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Julie. said:
Nope, 2.5mm^2 would be fine, the maximum load could only be 26A max for a double socket outlet, and realistically 20A , so some if not most installation methods would have the capacity, exactly the same as a spur off a RFC.

Would not have to be 6, or 4mm^2, and if it was a single socket or FCU probably 1.5mm^2 would be ok from a load perspective.

I ask the question, because one's initial thought is to object, but is it actually wrong?

I know it's unusual and unexpected, but perhaps more compliant and less unexpected than some things we see!
Click to expand...
The way I’ve always had it explained to me is that a spur off a RFC is fine because they’re in a ring and the socket won’t pull more than 26A. This is assuming cable is clipped direct.

However for, in this case, a shower circuit it’s not in a ring so the full load of 32A can go down it and overload the 2.5mm.

More than happy to hear other explanations and I’ve got my annual assessment next month so I’ll make a point of asking about this very scenario with the assessor as it will be interesting to see what their take on it is.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Raptor0014 said:
However for, in this case, a shower circuit it’s not in a ring so the full load of 32A can go down it and overload the 2.5mm.
Click to expand...
Not for a single or double socket as they have the 13A fuses limiting long-term loads to 13/26A (in fact most double sockets are only rated at 20A by specification).

If you have multiple sockets then yes, the feed cable had to be rated at the supply MCB to avoid overload risk, but for a single fused load it is limited by design.

When it comes to spurs off a RFC I dislike them for two reasons:
  • They break the end-end test on full continuity and resulting max R1+R2 from (r1+r2)/4
  • What starts as a single/double socket spurred off might then be spurred again like a radial but now violating the '2.5mm on 32A safe due to loop' aspect.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
pc1966 said:
...What starts as a single/double socket spurred off might then be spurred again like a radial but now violating the '2.5mm on 32A safe due to loop' aspect.
Click to expand...

This I agree with, which is why you may only take one point off on a spur, but soooo easy for a diyer not to know this.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Raptor0014 said:
The way I’ve always had it explained to me is that a spur off a RFC is fine because they’re in a ring and the socket won’t pull more than 26A. This is assuming cable is clipped direct.

However for, in this case, a shower circuit it’s not in a ring so the full load of 32A can go down it and overload the 2.5mm.

More than happy to hear other explanations and I’ve got my annual assessment next month so I’ll make a point of asking about this very scenario with the assessor as it will be interesting to see what their take on it is.
Click to expand...

As said by pc, this part of the circuit is the same as a spur, the only current which can go down it is that associated with the load on the end of it.

If that is a fixed value, or load limited by a fuse etc. Then no more than load current can flow unless there is a fault condition.

I can see us all grasping to try and back-fit some genuine, or invented regulation because it feels wrong.

I have no doubt that we all object and then actually struggle to justify why we object.

Which is why I asked the question, the example achives ads (assuming Zs is ok), has overload protection inherent due to single socket or fcu, has acceptable voltage drop, rcd etc.

So is compliant - why do we object?
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Julie. said:
So is compliant - why do we object?
Click to expand...
If we have to find regs to justify the general feeling of unease then:
  • The ones about separation of circuits spring to mind (as clearly sockets and showers are not natural bedfellows, and it is uncommon for a shower circuit to have even two showers attached as they are normally dedicated circuits)
  • The ones on general workmanship - as in it is clearly some bodge/short-cut to avoid wiring in to an existing RFC/radial that was put in specifically for socket use.

Too hungry to look them up just now as pizza has to be organised for my oven!
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
The 2.5mm2 cable to one single or double socket isn't the problem. The problem in practice will be the size of the cable common to the shower and the socket, and the rating of the circuit protection device not being high enough for both.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
As I said in my statement of the question, cable sizing, protective device sizing, Zs, rcd, ads etc being OK.

(The question is equally applicable to an fcu with a 1A fuse added to a 7.5kw shower supplied via a 40A mcb - with 10mm^2 cable)

What is the reason we try to find objections?
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Julie. said:
What is the reason we try to find objections?
Click to expand...
You've got me thinking - why do I hate it? I think it's because I have a sixth sense that the unusual nature of it could create safety issues, as others have said too. Hopefully not for sparks, though we do all make mistakes sometimes especially when tired. I'm thinking more of the DIY hero, or those that know enough to be dangerous.

So how do we feel about two rather predictable regs:

314 Division of Installation
314.1 Every installation shall be divided into circuits, as necessary, to:
ii) facilitate safe inspection, testing and maintenance
vi) prevent the indirect energizing of a circuit intended to be isolated

One might easily turn off and lock off "upstairs sockets", try a few sockets, and on a bad day having found every other socket upstairs dead not check the one that matters carefully enough. This might be construed to contravene indent ii).
It could work backwards too, you check that one and assume the rest are dead.
Unless there is space to adequately label the circuit, one would not expect the Shower breaker to be energising a double socket.

Another thought is 538.2. - saying that devices for isolation should be clearly identified by position or durable marking. If a shower pull cord isolator isolates a double socket, that probably contravenes this concept.

The question is, are these nit-picking issues from the regs book which are all open to interpretation legitimate enough reasons for the situation to worse than a C3?
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Julie. said:
As I said in my statement of the question, cable sizing, protective device sizing, Zs, rcd, ads etc being OK.

(The question is equally applicable to an fcu with a 1A fuse added to a 7.5kw shower supplied via a 40A mcb - with 10mm^2 cable)

What is the reason we try to find objections?
Click to expand...
I agree that many of us would go into knee jerk mode when presented with a situation that is out of the ordinary, and condemn it without thinking.
That's human nature. A kind of inertia. And even a kind of laziness, because it would require a deliberate effort to come up with a justification for something that would be much easier to condemn and walk away.
Also, too heavy a reliance on a book of regulations, which, in reality, cannot possibly regulate every single situation we might come across.
In other words, maybe we (myself included) should try to have more of an open mind when we see something like a socket connected to the same circuit as shower; or a pair of ring final circuits connected to the same circuit breaker!
And judge each situation accordingly. The case Julie just presented for example, would be much less of a problem, because of the different set of parameters.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Who needs prescribed zones anyway?😏

Live cables left plastered in a bathroom wall. Only came to light when the client removed a mirror and was doing some filling and the RCD tripped.

Looks like a disused feed for a mirror light.
[ElectriciansForums.net] Dodgy trade pictures for your amusement! - 1 Million Views!
[ElectriciansForums.net] Dodgy trade pictures for your amusement! - 1 Million Views!
 
Upvote 0 Downvote

Reply to Dodgy trade pictures for your amusement! - 1 Million Views! in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

Tilers Community
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
NHS Forums | Forum for NHS Staff and NHS Patients
Back
Top
✖
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks