About Stepper Motors

I am waiting with my wife at addenbrookes hospital Cambridge. The hospital is very large. Not had chance to watch your last video.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Addenbrooke's_Hospital

A question- what do you intend to use the nema17 stepper motor for? Knowing what for would provide me with some (extra) motivation to get started.

marconi said:

I am waiting with my wife at addenbrookes hospital Cambridge. The hospital is very large. Not had chance to watch your last video.

Click to expand...

You will, when you will be bored out of your ears. Waiting in hospital, I know that story, I actually waited for days at some point in my life. I hope is not something serious, but a routine check, right? I wish you and your wife good luck. Good luck from Romania is a precious thing, you get it very rarely in your life. So use it well.
The motor eh? Haha. Well... not really-really a plan per say... but I do have something in mind. Its a very simple thing, but we will get there. Trust me. For now, I want a very serious and stable and reliable stepper motor driver/controller. That is capable (most importantly) to drive at full potential these motors ! Not like my dinky driver that is able to spin them but not really put them to serious work. You get the idea.
Another important thing is accessibility ! We, humans, in these modern days, we got used to already made boards that are performing very well, no doubt about that. But it should be correct to have the proper circuits to build those well performing boards they sell so expensive as well. Dont you think? I very much do. So from that aspect of things, I am very ----ed off and I want to correct it. I want a (very) good performant cct for driving these motors, available, online, on internet, and not hunt for help. That's important ! In my mind. I hope I transmitted to you the same feeling I have. And you should transmit it as well further.

I doubt my circuit will be the acme of what is possible. To do that requires considerable testing and real life trials to discover and fix problems which may at first be hidden. That is why in my view some of the best technology is often years old. But my breadboard may work reasonably well as a technology demonstrator which with your patience you can perfect.

Not acme as you say. Good enough is good for me. You know me.
My only concern is to work at a certain randament or in other words at a certain values I put it to work.
Simple.

Stepper and mosfets arrived. And I thought I would do some reading up since the last time I made any circuitry for stepper motors was 40 years ago at college:

https://www.ti.com/lit/ml/slua618a/slua618a.pdf?ts=1666798524312

If you dip into this reference you will see there is more to a good driver circuit than at first blush*. Maybe too mathematical for you but the text is reasonably understandable.

*
at first blush

phrase of blush

1. at the first glimpse or impression.
   "his next decision was at first blush disconcerting"

WOW- it must cost you a small fortune.
I have a success ! With the mosfets !
I managed to install a primary external PSU of 12V to drive all the gates and the voltage regulator and the logic circuit.
And a secondary PSU, my variable PSU that I can monitor the Amps and Volts on the motor itself.
Here is what I tried:

The 4wire NEMA17 - the new one, worked excellent at the lowest fv to the highest. I didnt reach 5V, but up to it, like 4.5, 4.8V. But the amperage was considerable high, at 1A, 1,2, 1.5. I keep it running most of the time somewhere at 300mA-to-600mA.
Some of the Tr were hot and some were Very-Hot.



I am very happy that nothing burned out.
Well... in my first try I actually forget a link wire in the breadboard and that got extremely hot and the plastic got in thick smoke and I thought it was a Tr. But the Tr was fine. Haha. But that was the only incident and at relatively low power.
No motors , no Tr and no important components were damaged.
The Voltage regulator started to heat up quite high with a heat sink on it. BIGGER is BETTER was always my motto. Haha. But that can wait.
The only failure I have so far, with this current circuit that I just tested, is the second 4wire scrapped motor. It only trembled and never rotated. I switched its connection wires a lot and the motor could NOT start rotating. Only vibrating. I noticed the new NEMA17 was trembling until 4V but after 4V started rotating. So, I increased the Amps and Volts for the scrapped one, I reached 5.5V but at a very high Amp of ~2A, so I dialed down for safety. The Tr's got extremly hot at that point. I did all this experimentation as quickly as I could, in a couple of seconds, no more than 10s per high level of power. Usually I keep everything working at a very safe temperature and power of 300mA and somewhere at 2V. At this level Ican see trembling in the motors and also no heat on the Mosfets or the VoltageRegulator.
Like the BJT version, this mosfet version has the Voltage dependent to the Amps. But is a lot better because is not limited like the BJT was. I couldnt reach 1A with the BJT. If I remember right. At 600mA everything was starting to get extremely hot. So usually if I remember right I was keeping at 300mA or less. Back then the scrapped motor worked perfectly for the tiniest impulses. But now.....????
Now that I have 2 functional circuits, its a stage completed at this point.
I will try to build the BJT that give me the best results, as a stand alone board. As weak as it was, it did served very well for testing the motors. This more powerful mosfet circuit.... hmmm, I will come to it when I will finish the BJT one. If the scrapped motor worked with this mosfet circuit, I would have been very happy. So far im only 50% happy.

comments from the other forum:
I only look at the top Transistors. All the bottom ones are drive at 5V ! So 4 mosfets in the lower side. Hmmm. I didnt notice it. But it worked like that, haha.
Someone noticed 2 of the mosfets are still working at 5V, and I looked more closely and 4 of them , the bottom ones, are at 5V but I notice after all the thing worked as described. Hahaha
It worked fine....

Good morning. I have been studying your latest driver circuit, the one with some mosfets circled in red. I think you have made a wiring error between the cd4017 and the two H bridges. If you think of each of each H bridge as being made up of diagonal pairs of mosfets ie \ and /, then for wave switching the pairs are switched on as in my attachment to #7.

The sequence, looking at my #7 table is 1, 4, 2, 3, 1, 4, 2, 3, 1……..where these numbers refer to the pairs of Q transistors read left to right 1, 2, 3, 4.

Your pairs of diagonal transistor are being switched 1, 3, 2, 4, 1, 3, 2, 4, 1…….

If you study your diagrams at #1 and #36 in the way the 4017 is connected to the two H bridges you should see what I mean.

Thank you for your last comment.
My friend mister @marconi ... check this out, what I received today !

The far right IC that almost has no marking left on it is the one from you. I notice mine are bigger. I didnt realized it when I buy them. Eh...
Cool, yes ?

_q12x_ said:

Thank you for your last comment.
My friend mister @marconi ... check this out, what I received today !
View attachment 103229View attachment 103231
The far right IC that almost has no marking left on it is the one from you. I notice mine are bigger. I didnt realized it when I buy them. Eh...
Cool, yes ?

Click to expand...

Your chips At28c64 have 64k of memory whereas the At28c16 I sent you had 16k. Otherwise they have the same technology inside. There are two more pins for the address on yours A11 and A12.

marconi said:

There are two more pins for the address on yours A11 and A12 to address 64k rather than 16k since 2exp2 is 4.

Click to expand...

Im not sure how your math works but here is my math:
2^16 = 65536 bit combinations (your chip)
2^64 = 1.8446744e+19 which is 2 quatrilions probably of bit combinations. And not 4 like you calculated. Haha.

_q12x_ said:

Im not sure how your math works but here is my math:
2^16 = 65536 bit combinations (your chip)
2^64 = 1.8446744e+19 which is 2 quatrilions probably of bit combinations. And not 4 like you calculated. Haha.

Click to expand...

16k memory locations is organised as 2048 x 8 bit memory locations shortened to 2k x 8 bits = 16k. 2exp11 = 2048. Address word A0 to A10.

64k is 4 x 2048 x 8 bit = 8192 x 8 bits = 8k x 8 bits. 2exp13 = 8192. Address word A0 to A12.

Aha... I believe this number 2048 and 8192 are referring to the Addresses/or/MemoryRegisters of the IC.
I think I get your point. Im not used to think in these terms, I still lack some experience but im not far away. Thanks for your kind explanation !

marconi said:

https://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/doc0270.pdf

Click to expand...

- I open it before I buy it. Im always reading the datasheet, I got used to it and is a routine now for me.
Good thought but im doing it all the time. I didnt read it corner to corner, I only fly over it, I smell it. Haha. Probably I will, in the future.
- For now I showed you that your influence grow with me. I liked the IC especially after that HARD circuit I made, also with your help, I realized it is a very good chip to have. And it was quite cheap anyway so I made the step and took them. How I will use them... we'll see in time.