Torque Talk | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Torque Talk in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Marvo

-
Staff member
Mod
Mentor
Supporter
Joined
Nov 5, 2010
Messages
16,777
Reaction score
10,457
Location
South Africa
Long time no see and I hope you're all doing well.

I see that torque screwdrivers have become the height of fashion in the UK over the last couple of years. I wondered what general practice has been adopted regarding their use.

Are electricians expected to;
Have a torque screwdriver on site at all times?
Check torque of all terminations in CU's / DB's they open or just any new terminations they make?
Check the torque of all terminations in any accessories they open?

Also;
Is acceptable to do torque testing live in a CU (assuming a VDE screwdriver)? Is a risk assessment required for live torque testing?
If torque testing is performed in a DB/CU do you just check screws for tightness or do you loosen off all terminations first then re-torque to the correct figure to eliminate overtightened connections as well as loose ones?
 
I'm sure you could borrow someones torque screwdriver and self calibrate your wrist against it :)

I don't carry a torque screwdriver on site either but I have a range of very accurate versions in our workshop that are about 15 years old and too expensive to carry around. I'm thinking about getting one of these new snazzy looking red and yellow plastic ones although I wouldn't use it very often with the type of work I do. I'm just interested how they're used in the UK and what the recognised usage practices are now they've been popular for a while.
 
I have and use a torque driver for a few years now.
I have found more and more manufacturers listing required torque either in the instructions or on the product next to the terminals (that's if they aren't push in) so that it's obvious.
As to whether or not I agree with that setting is another matter as some of them seem to be extremely low.
So I do if there are settings listed anything else is down to the torque elbow!
Sy
 
I have and use a torque driver for a few years now.
I have found more and more manufacturers listing required torque either in the instructions or on the product next to the terminals (that's if they aren't push in) so that it's obvious.
As to whether or not I agree with that setting is another matter as some of them seem to be extremely low.
So I do if there are settings listed anything else is down to the torque elbow!
Sy

Just over 1Nm on outgoing side of certain breakers seems a tad low for higher ratings with stranded cables, but likewise I (mostly) tend to set torque where manufacturer has clearly requested it.
 
If you don't have one in your tool bag, and you ever find yourself in court defending an installation such as a consumer unit that has e.g. overheated or caught fire, how do you explain how you did the terminals up to manufacturer's instructions. My college tutor used to tell a story about this, of someone being cross examined about the contents of their tool bag after such an occurence, they didn't see where the questioning was leading.
 
I have 2 vde versions and the only time that they ever see the light of day is on a board change , I do all the connections up by hand then go round at the very end and torque everything up.
To be fair its just another one of those items you shell out £100+ for an it lives in a box for 99% of its days.
I probably did 500 boards before I ever got a torque screwdriver and as far as I know none of them caught fire ( yet )
 
As above, only use mine on distribution boards.

3.5nm on some terminals seems a lot and I quite often find the screwdriver slipping and starting to round the screw head before the driver clicks to confirm torque.

On the flipside, one board I’ve worked on asks for all connections on the earth bar to be 2.0 or 2.5nm (can’t remember which) and the main earth pops right out

being honest I much prefer the old fashioned DIY way of going with your gut instinct
 
Quite often I find my self doing the torque up and still checking again afterwards by hand as I don't trust the torque screwdriver

I honestly don't think you can beat an experienced hand/arm when it comes to making good connections
 
Quite often I find my self doing the torque up and still checking again afterwards by hand as I don't trust the torque screwdriver

I honestly don't think you can beat an experienced hand/arm when it comes to making good connections
Is that a lack of trust in the accuracy of the screwdriver or lack of trust in the manufacturers published torque spec?

When you say you recheck by hand afterwards do you mean you 'tug test' the wires or you go again with a normal screwdriver?
 
If you don't have one in your tool bag, and you ever find yourself in court defending an installation such as a consumer unit that has e.g. overheated or caught fire, how do you explain how you did the terminals up to manufacturer's instructions. My college tutor used to tell a story about this, of someone being cross examined about the contents of their tool bag after such an occurence, they didn't see where the questioning was leading.
Always have whats legally required. Down to you if you want to use it , But have it :)
 
I’ve got a torque driver, only gets used on boards though. I don’t go back and retighten with a regular screwdriver…. That’s just pointless.
I will, however, check every terminal in a board even if I’m just working on one circuit… although that only finds loose connections, not over-tightened ones.

Someone else on here has my ones twin.

It came with a #1 and a #2 +/- bit which I manage to break the tip off the smaller one on an RCBO at not very much N/m setting (warranty replacement, got both sizes in return)

Also the one I have doesn’t fit any other brand of driver bit. Just slightly too small.

And final gripe, the increments go up in .2 so 1.0, 1.2, 1.4 etc
When most published torque settings for MCBs and the like end in .5


In a response to some other comments….

“I’ve done loads of boards without a torque driver, and none have gone on fire”……
That you know of. Maybe further work has been done, which has been blamed.

“Always have what’s legally required. Down to you if you use it”
This is sadly true. How many instances of drive by EICRs have we seen where the £1000 MFT has never left its box.
 
Is that a lack of trust in the accuracy of the screwdriver or lack of trust in the manufacturers published torque spec?

When you say you recheck by hand afterwards do you mean you 'tug test' the wires or you go again with a normal screwdriver?
Go back round checking with a normal Screwdriver
 
Hey Stranger! Good to see you - was beginning to wonder if all was OK.

As for Torque screwdrivers..... I've got one, bottom on the toolbag, never been asked to show it on any inspection ever! It's not VDE and it's also never been calibrated, but it does do a really good job of holding my extra-wide flat bit for doing up tray bolts ;)
 
The wiring regulations (Regs) themselves do not mandate the use of torque screwdrivers.

However they state at 134.1.1 that "the installation shall take account of manufacturers' instructions".

The word "Shall" in British Standards means a requirement, or in plain English a MUST.

So the Regs state that you MUST take manufacturers instructions into account.

However it is odd that the Regs do not explicitly mandate that the manufacturers' instructions are adhered to.

Even if you MUST adhere to manufacturers' instructions, they do tend to be rather vague and very poorly written. Very few state categorically that connections MUST be set to specified torque.

Quite why this is so vague is beyond me, rather inexcusable of British Standards in my book.

Read into that what you will. I read into all this that torque screwdrivers are optional but can see that in some cases use of them is good professional practice; maybe that is the real intent behind the vague language from British Standards.
 

Attachments

  • [ElectriciansForums.net] Torque Talk
    torque.JPG
    29.9 KB · Views: 26
The wiring regulations (Regs) themselves do not mandate the use of torque screwdrivers.

However they state at 134.1.1 that "the installation shall take account of manufacturers' instructions".

The word "Shall" in British Standards means a requirement, or in plain English a MUST.

So the Regs state that you MUST take manufacturers instructions into account.

However it is odd that the Regs do not explicitly mandate that the manufacturers' instructions are adhered to.

Even if you MUST adhere to manufacturers' instructions, they do tend to be rather vague and very poorly written. Very few state categorically that connections MUST be set to specified torque.

Quite why this is so vague is beyond me, rather inexcusable of British Standards in my book.

Read into that what you will. I read into all this that torque screwdrivers are optional but can see that in some cases use of them is good professional practice; maybe that is the real intent behind the vague language from British Standards.

You've answered your own point about why the regs say that manufacturer's instructions do not have to be strictly adhered to - if we did that with some of the badly written/translated rubbish that often comes with items these days then it wouldn't go well !
 
Well it is. Very confusing. Read my post of a few minutes ago. In summary, "taking account of" does not mean "must be complied with" and also instructions are generally crap....hence the confusion.

I think I'm missing your point here.

We should take account of manufacturer's instructions, but not necessarily rigidly follow them.

That's straightforward to me. Look at them, but if they are incorrect, badly translated, or geared towards another country's electrical system then adapt as appropriate. A competent electrician will be able to do this.

Let me know if I've missed something
 
I think I'm missing your point here.

We should take account of manufacturer's instructions, but not necessarily rigidly follow them.

That's straightforward to me. Look at them, but if they are incorrect, badly translated, or geared towards another country's electrical system then adapt as appropriate. A competent electrician will be able to do this.

Let me know if I've missed something
You are missing the OP's opening gambit - asking if Torque screwdrivers are mandated....and think it is fair to say that they are not !
 
You are missing the OP's opening gambit - asking if Torque screwdrivers are mandated....and think it is fair to say that they are not !

No, they are not. The regs don't mandate which specific tools to use, only that things are installed correctly and tested correctly.
 
The manufacturers' instructions have to allow for the situation where a newly qualified installer wishes to fit their component to the highest standard. It might be the first real installation work in their career, with very little experience to guide them on how terminals behave. By providing torque figures the manufacturers can help ensure them achieve a good installation and begin to learn what is appropriate for each of 101 different types of terminal, based on factory tested torques instead of guesswork.

An experienced installer whose approach combines craftsmanship and engineering, takes the time to examine and test their finished work and that of others, reads up on how devices are made, analyses failures etc. might have as good an idea of the appropriate torque as the manufacturers themselves. They will account for factors that are excluded from the sterile lab environment in which the published figures are devised and fine tune according to variables that cannot be included in a one-figure-fits-all torque setting printed on the side of an MCB.

I am interested to know the correct torque and will test it to decide whether I think it is appropriate. Sometimes, as mentioned above, I find recommended torques somewhat low. I trust my own judgement and would happily defend a departure from the published figure because I consider myself sufficiently competent in the craft and science of termination, and believe I could demonstrate that competence if required.
 

Reply to Torque Talk in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

  • Question
And exciting when that Hager AFDD finally tripped 😂
2
Replies
28
Views
2K
nicebutdim
N
Thank you for your response. I really appreciate it.
Replies
13
Views
620
  • Question
"A catalogue of errors" would be the appropriate phrase here and I agree with Avo and James that HSE need to be involved rather than this forum...
Replies
4
Views
1K
I am a landlord/owner of a flat. I am just about to spur off nearby sockets to provide the additional 24hr supply to new Dimplex Quantum storage...
Replies
0
Views
471
  • Question
If they got a shock then something cannot have been isolated.
Replies
7
Views
1K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks