D
dougalthedog
Hi,
Is there an accepted definition of "accessible" e.g. from G83 as the DTI guide requires the AC isolator to be in an accessible location. For example is a loft considered accessible?
The DTI guide shows 2 isolators where the inverter and meter are physically separate, however BS7671 (which is more recent) clearly shows the AC isolator located adjacent to the inverter and only an overcurrent device at the CU.
Also in another thread I note a poster states it is not acceptable to connect a PV system to a 16A MCB on the RCD side of a (presumably single RCD) split load box. Is this correct and if so why - or was the poster referring to TL inverters only?
Is it to minimise interruption of other services in the case of earth leakage? Clearly unless the cable is buried >50mm etc RCD protection is required by BS7671.
What is normal practice - fit 2 isolators when the inverter is remote?
Thanks.
Is there an accepted definition of "accessible" e.g. from G83 as the DTI guide requires the AC isolator to be in an accessible location. For example is a loft considered accessible?
The DTI guide shows 2 isolators where the inverter and meter are physically separate, however BS7671 (which is more recent) clearly shows the AC isolator located adjacent to the inverter and only an overcurrent device at the CU.
Also in another thread I note a poster states it is not acceptable to connect a PV system to a 16A MCB on the RCD side of a (presumably single RCD) split load box. Is this correct and if so why - or was the poster referring to TL inverters only?
Is it to minimise interruption of other services in the case of earth leakage? Clearly unless the cable is buried >50mm etc RCD protection is required by BS7671.
What is normal practice - fit 2 isolators when the inverter is remote?
Thanks.