panel query regarding protection

Hi,

To be honest I would be questioning this set up, but wait a while and see if Darkwood turns up; as he is your man when it comes to panels and controls.

Regards.

This panel doesn't fall within the BS7671 it falls under BS60204-1 (General requirements for machinery control). Also other sub-sections of the BS60204 may be regulatory depending on what the panel controls.

BS7671 does have a few limited clauses regarding motor protection etc which mimic what is already in the BS60204.

Your Query about cable sizing is noted and what you have to take into account is this is not like a house rewire etc, many other protective measures can be used up or down stream of the main device. You will find that the majority of the time control panel loads have a fixed demand ... example the Incoming short circuit protection been covered by the MCB then the OL device on the contactor for a motor gives a fixed max limit of current that the cable could ever demand, this means the conventional fusing down isn't needed as such.

At the snippet of a pic you have posted my only comments are minor - lack of numbering on power cables, Power cables should all be black within the panel wiring and not in phase colours although BS60204 -1 (13.2.4) for colour coding is a recommendation where colour is used to identify the conductors use. As their is no other form of marking on his power cables he should have used all black.

BTW what is the panel doing?
Is their a safety relay - E-stop system (May not be required).
Blue conductors should all be clearly marked N and numbered as blue otherwise denotes DC control.
Are the socket outlets given 30mA rcd protection or are they covered by the 300mA you mentioned.. if 300mA what is the use ofthe sockets?

Your other queries ... the 1mm to the motors is adequate as the motor OL device protects them regardless of a RCD been in the set-up or not, depending on the make of wire the tri-rated 4mm will be rated approx 40-45amps so seems sufficient for the set-up ....again just a glimpsing observation as lack the info.

Judging by the lack on marking I can only guess no wiring plans and other relevant info has been supplied?

Lastly be careful of any critisism you do of the panel without knowledge of the relative regulations you will likely be shot down in flames ... I've been slated twice for similar reasons as your query and I arranged to meet the company boss with the Electrical contractor slating my work and tore him a new rectum hole .. he walked out with his tail between his legs and a caution that if i hear he has slated anymore of my work I will be sending my legal team to have a chat regarding defamation towords myself and business.... he kept well away from me the rest of the job.

The panel is CE marked so don't worry, if it's not then send it back as it is not fit for purpose.
END OF as it is a Statutory Requirement.
BTW, DW is not far off, but it falls more correctly under the LVD, of which 60204 is one of the standards that you can use for compliance.

netblindpaul said:

The panel is CE marked so don't worry, if it's not then send it back as it is not fit for purpose.
END OF as it is a Statutory Requirement.
BTW, DW is not far off, but it falls more correctly under the LVD, of which 60204 is one of the standards that you can use for compliance.

Click to expand...

Good point and on that note the new harmonisation of the LVT with EU member states is out now which will be applicable from 2016 ... need to catch up with it at some point :uhoh2:

Panel function - Main electrical control and distribution for a mobile grain dresser.
fitted to rigid 17.5Ton truck, 60KVA Generator feeds the panel with a SY 5C16mm.

Im still not really happy with the panel, I have read some information relating to B EN 60204 and the way I understand it, each motor circuit should be protected for overcurrent of the contactor rating. for instance one of the biggest contactors is 32A rated, therefore I see it that it isn't protected for that particular contactor as it is only protected by the 63A MCB and RCD. I have knocked a quick drawing up of the panel as it is wired could you glance over it and give me your feedback.

this is just an additional issue I have with the panel, the panel was delivered with the isolator exposed incoming terminals 1/2 inch clear of the bottom of the enclosure, isolator operating handle an inch too short, no shrouds for exposed isolator parts, outgoing connection terminals only rated at 24A, ok on most but not all, and only crimping the boot lace crimps on the very tip due to how narrow they were. due to all these reasons I have picked further and this is what leads me to believe the wiring may be at fault also.

That panel does not comply with 60204.

net blind paul, can you give me a little more on that please, I have been asked to evaluate its suitability, which at the moment I have stated, its not fit for purpose in my opinion, I could just do with a bit of meat why.

Look at 60204-1 & see what the standard says about control voltages & colour coding as a start.
I can see no control transformer with primary and secondary protection as a start.

Have to agree with you on the interlock switch its too close to the base, no room for your incoming lugs and is exposed and dangerous to anyone opening the panel without upstream isolation.

Im scratching my head at the sheer number of relays here although I don't have the wiring plans I think the guy who did this is old school and is many years behind technology this is crying out for a PLC to get rid of the bulk of those relays.

The box is over crowded too no allowance for maintenance, repair or additions where the new parts may require more room in some cases.



Here's my last weeks project ...it was in-house and i had to re-use existing star/delta contactors and to the keen eyed ive made a few excursions from the BS60204 but nothing of safety issue.

I can't see any circuit protection on the RS dc power supply, if that is what it is as you are using blue singles.
For the price of 2 off 2 pole MCB's why not, when it is stipulated?
Also the red power cores in the top RH corner.
Else, I can't see anything that I would be overly concerned about in a 30 second look at the pic.

The relays are due to the guy wanting to run the plant manually? he talked the company in to it for some reason. that's also an issue that I have to pull up with him tomorrow as his relays switch out safety functions and allow the plant to choke.is it not permissible to use a 240V control circuit? or I it ok when used with a 30mA RCD?Where's the cheapest place to buy the 60204 in pdf tonight, mine are at work and could do with a read up now at home.

netblindpaul said:

I can't see any circuit protection on the RS dc power supply, if that is what it is as you are using blue singles.
For the price of 2 off 2 pole MCB's why not, when it is stipulated?
Also the red power cores in the top RH corner.
Else, I can't see anything that I would be overly concerned about in a 30 second look at the pic.

Click to expand...

You not seen the MCB's at the top L/H corner? these cover primary of the dc power supply 1p+n and the 3pole is the protection for the star/delta set-up its 400v coils tapped of the incoming to the contactors.

The dc side of the power supply unit is internally O/L protected and S/C protected, no need for external fusing on the dc controls.

This panel must meet the LVD.
One of the applicable A, B & C standards is 60204.
To be honest if you are putting together a professional engineering report on this then you need to have copies of the LVD & all of the relevant standards.
If this goes to civil or criminal court, without these you will be made into mincemeat.
You really need to consider your role in this carefully.
Also, it seems that it is a case of the blind leading the partially sighted.
The specifier was blind and the builder was partially sighted!
Look in 60204 & you will see the requirement for control circuit supplies.

pulling back round to the original question, should there be over current protection, at least a fuse preferably an MCB in line with each motor circuit t protect the cable and contactor from overcurrent an short circuit fault. 63A rated cable from the bottom of the rcd, preferably feeing a rated bus bar connector in the top of the contactors and breakers.

Monty2010 said:

The relays are due to the guy wanting to run the plant manually? he talked the company in to it for some reason. that's also an issue that I have to pull up with him tomorrow as his relays switch out safety functions and allow the plant to choke.is it not permissible to use a 240V control circuit? or I it ok when used with a 30mA RCD?Where's the cheapest place to buy the 60204 in pdf tonight, mine are at work and could do with a read up now at home.

Click to expand...

Where are all the controls on the front door or any remote of the panel?
If the control is 230v where is the isolating transformer? ....

you original question is no the OL of the motors protects the cables from overload its just done downstream rather than upstream ... like netblind says if it aint EC marked and supplied with the relevant documents don't accept it, the more i look at it the more i see and the more i believe its a old hat probably mature sparks / engineer that has not keep up with times.

Regarding my plc comment his reason for so many relays is a fob off it has no bearing on manual control and you already highlight control issues anyway.

Is there a risk element to the user of this machine ... would their be a need for a E stop in your mind?

darkwood said:

You not seen the MCB's at the top L/H corner? these cover primary of the dc power supply 1p+n and the 3pole is the protection for the star/delta set-up its 400v coils tapped of the incoming to the contactors.

The dc side of the power supply unit is internally O/L protected and S/C protected, no need for external fusing on the dc controls.

Click to expand...

Yes I saw MCB's top LH corner, but these are power MCB's black in black out.
Once the wiring leaves the MCB to supply a control circuit, it becomes a control circuit, thus, is is no longer a power circuit?...
Personally I don't believe that the dc side complies without fusing/mcb protection as I can't see what the details of the power supply, so until I do, I have to say it requires protection don't I!

netblindpaul said:

Yes I saw MCB's top LH corner, but these are power MCB's black in black out.
Once the wiring leaves the MCB to supply a control circuit, it becomes a control circuit, thus, is is no longer a power circuit?...
Personally I don't believe that the dc side complies without fusing/mcb protection as I can't see what the details of the power supply, so until I do, I have to say it requires protection don't I!

Click to expand...

http://docs-europe.electrocomponents.com/webdocs/0add/0900766b80addf4e.pdf

darkwood said:

Where are all the controls on the front door or any remote of the panel?
If the control is 230v where is the isolating transformer? ....

you original question is no the OL of the motors protects the cables from overload its just done downstream rather than upstream ... like netblind says if it aint EC marked and supplied with the relevant documents don't accept it, the more i look at it the more i see and the more i believe its a old hat probably mature sparks / engineer that has not keep up with times.

Regarding my plc comment his reason for so many relays is a fob off it has no bearing on manual control and you already highlight control issues anyway.

Is there a risk element to the user of this machine ... would their be a need for a E stop in your mind?

Click to expand...

Controls all on front door, except a remote switch for forward/reverse of an auger
There is no isolating TX
E stop circuit feeds first relay, which then feeds control circuit from there.
The spark is about 35, he strikes me as domestic turned panel builder.

darkwood said:

Where are all the controls on the front door or any remote of the panel?If the control is 230v where is the isolating transformer? .... you original question is no the OL of the motors protects the cables from overload its just done downstream rather than upstream ... like netblind says if it aint EC marked and supplied with the relevant documents don't accept it, the more i look at it the more i see and the more i believe its a old hat probably mature sparks / engineer that has not keep up with times.Regarding my plc comment his reason for so many relays is a fob off it has no bearing on manual control and you already highlight control issues anyway.Is there a risk element to the user of this machine ... would their be a need for a E stop in your mind?

Click to expand...

Controls all on front door, except a remote switch for forward/reverse of an augerThere is no isolating TXE stop circuit feeds first relay, which then feeds control circuit from there.The spark is about 35, he strikes me as domestic turned panel builder.

As this is a discussion in an open forum i would remove the schematics and at least blank the company name out at the top... you could find yourself in a legal tangle if this thread is brought to his attention as he could seek defamation.

Ps my Bedtime CYL

darkwood said:

As this is a discussion in an open forum i would remove the schematics and at least blank the company name out at the top... you could find yourself in a legal tangle if this thread is brought to his attention as he could seek defamation.

Ps my Bedtime CYL

Click to expand...

Yep same here, cheers for your input, drawings removed, I looked passed the name on them and missed it.

Those inverters are so user friendly it's unreal darkwood, that panels a right state too (tongue in cheek!)

darkwood said:

As this is a discussion in an open forum i would remove the schematics and at least blank the company name out at the top... you could find yourself in a legal tangle if this thread is brought to his attention as he could seek defamation.

Ps my Bedtime CYL

Click to expand...

Whilst I agree it's not a good idea to put a company name to it and I'm by no means a legal expert but I was told if you stick to fact and opinion you are ok, the fact is that is how the panel is, the op is asking for clarification on some points which in his opinion may not ok. There are far worse things that people say on here that are accepted , I really can't see a company spending time and effort going after someone for questioning a product. If they did it would make interesting reading as you would be free to tell people they are perusing you.

wozz said:

Whilst I agree it's not a good idea to put a company name to it and I'm by no means a legal expert but I was told if you stick to fact and opinion you are ok, the fact is that is how the panel is, the op is asking for clarification on some points which in his opinion may not ok. There are far worse things that people say on here that are accepted , I really can't see a company spending time and effort going after someone for questioning a product. If they did it would make interesting reading as you would be free to tell people they are perusing you.

Click to expand...

Its more a forum policy too and when discrediting someone's work in the public eye if you name them or their company then those been discredited have the right to defend their actions and as they are not part of the conversation it can easily get to a stage where defamation is used.

Although we are discussing the BS60204-1 in particular here its wording in many area is 'preferably' - 'recommended' and many clauses have sub clauses which allow agreed deviations from the regs ...eg - colour coding of indicator lights may conflict with existing plant controls and thus an agreement is reached you will deviate from regulation and bring the panel in line with existing plant control colour codes.

From our observing point of view we have been given limited info so can only comment on what we see which could be misleading as we don't know the exact spec of the control system or any agreed excursions from regulations although we can point out where we feel the panel doesn't seem to be in line the LVD and more specifically 60204 - 1 as our discussion goes.

Like the BS7671 the Bs 60204 is a guide and there is as far as I know no legal requirement to follow it in the uk at least but there is a legal requirement to meet the health and safety issues in the directive thus following the relevant BS standards forms the best and easiest route to achieving this.