manufacturer's instructions vs common sense! | Page 2 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss manufacturer's instructions vs common sense! in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

E

Eddiesparks

Ok I know this is dragged up time and time again regarding the 3a fuse on a fan debate but i had an interesting one today.

i am installing a belling 100dft range cooker, the manufacturer's instructions are tight lipped about the actual wattage of the bleeding thing but the info I got was that it needs to be protected by a 32a mcb and also in the manufacturer's data it says that you need to install in 6mm t&e.

The cable run is relatively short, voltage drop is ok and reference method is C - clipped direct - IE clipped direct to a joist with no insulation around it and also chased in for a short run down to the cooker isolator (correct me if i am wrong but this is my understanding of the reference method C), for this reason I decided to go for 4mm t&e protected by a 32a mcb - CCC is 37a so ok for a 32a mcb. Now technically this is against the manufacturer's data but I would claim common sense on this one - the manufactirer's data probably assumes that the person installing may have no idea about cable calculations and could be installing in loads of insulation etc so to save the job of calculating they over spec with the cable size. Would you agree??

Ignoring the "best practice to use 6mm for the future" aspect do you think i was right or wrong
in this instance???

Thanks a lot peoples
 
I suppose if you do use 4mm and the maufacturers instructions have said 6mm you may invalidate any warranty. Common sense doesn't seem to play much of a part with regards insurance companies!

Infact quite a lot of maunufacturers instructions do seem to say 6mm!

It seems as though you've based the 4mm on this one cooker, which could cause problems for the future when it gets changed. If it was a short run why didn't you just use the standard 6mm Eddie, it would't have been much of a difference in cost?

i hope you have one of these handy
 

Attachments

  • [ElectriciansForums.net] manufacturer's instructions vs common sense!
    image.jpg
    9.5 KB · Views: 76
He hasn't. I put it on after posting #23!

Quite looking forward to this!

I've either said something silly (which is extremely possible!!) or there simply is nothing wrong with 4mm!!

Cant be too bad if the experienced Murdoch said it too, so I feel fairly safe :smiley2:
 
As has already been said earlier, how can a manufacturer recommend a cable size without knowing installation method, Ze, length of cable?



Since when did any type of circuit have "standard" cable for it?

To the first part Dillb.. I can't see where I have justified the maufacturers instructions with regards their choice of cable?

And to the second.. perhaps a poor choice of words 'standard'. But answer me honestly what size cable do you most often find in houses coming from the CU to the DP cooker switch? That doesn't mean 6mm is 'the' cable for cookers, but why not put it in rather than 4mm for future proofing?
 
It doesn't what is usually selected, it should be properly selected. Why future proof a cooker circuit? Would you install a larger cable for a fan oven just in case?

You tried to justify the manufacturers instructions by saying it will invalidate the warranty, how the hell will that happen if the cable is selected correctly?
 
Sorry Dillb, No offence meant but I think whatever I say you'll find fault, that seems to be your style. Its ok for you to be wrong sometimes you know. :smiley2:
 
Future proofing lol.

Thats like wiring a socket in 10mm2 cable beacuse one day someone may move into the house and want to connect a welder to the cable lol haha

Come on Mike. What would you generally use for a cooker when your doing a new build?
 
Future proofing lol.

Thats like wiring a socket in 10mm2 cable beacuse one day someone may move into the house and want to connect a welder to the cable lol haha

I think all rings should be 10mm, no more discussions on unbalanced rings then :smiley2:
 
in the manufacturer's data it says that you need to install in 6mm t&e.

When I see things like this I always wonder is the manufacturer seriously suggesting that using singles in containment is not acceptable? They shouldn't specify type of cable like that let alone the csa.
 
I've noticed a lot more of the kit I install has " If in doubt consult a qualified electrician"

TBF I do this anyway.

I consult myself, browse the instructions for any new jokes and then do what I feel is the right thing to do.
 
Basically i wouldn't fluff around installing a 4mm cable for a cooker point. The so-called standard arrangement for a typical domestic cooker point, has been 6mm cable with an OCPD of 32A (or 7/044 /30A OCPD) based on upto a 15 KW load, and has been so now for well over 60+ years....
 
Exactly... Electrically fine but not a convincing plan overall. While we can concoct all sorts of unlikely 'future developments' that would require 10mm² for the socket outlets, we can predict the future use of a cooker circuit with more certainty. Cookers are usually replaced by cookers, and the next cooker might require 6mm². If the existing cooker turns out to be a poor choice and gets replaced in a couple of years, it would be a shame to have to rewire so soon.
 
I suppose if you do use 4mm and the maufacturers instructions have said 6mm you may invalidate any warranty. Common sense doesn't seem to play much of a part with regards insurance companies!

Infact quite a lot of maunufacturers instructions do seem to say 6mm!

It seems as though you've based the 4mm on this one cooker, which could cause problems for the future when it gets changed. If it was a short run why didn't you just use the standard 6mm Eddie, it would't have been much of a difference in cost?

Ahh that old chestnut I suppose if a long run was needed and 10mm² was used that would invalidate the warranty as well, no doubt we'll have somebody come on and say they would code it as C1 on an EICR as the manufacturers said 6mm² and only 4mm² was installed

I think all rings should be 10mm, no more discussions on unbalanced rings then :smiley2:

Can you recommend some sockets where I don't need to reduce the CSA to get two 10mm² cables in the terminals :grin:
 
:troll:Hmm, using a conductive material for the socket body, using a poorer conductor for the earthing instead of copper (but upping the CSA), positioning earthing terminals in line with the route the spanner will need to take to undo the live terminals(Which MK did anyway), requiring a 47mm+ back box, I can see some problems.:prrr::crazy:

However ease of termination of my 1.5mm² spur should be easy!
Should not be any problem with connecting the cpcs.
I am still not convinced that dressing the cables in will be easy:nono:.

Good try and definitely future proofed... until they abolish the ring circuit (not so sure about present proofed!)
I will go for my 20A radial with 2.5mm² conductors.:smile:

Oh yes and it would probably look like Ferg's picture on the wall (but that is just getting people acclimatised)
 
I think it's about time sockets came prewired with 20mtrs of 2.5mm x 3, already connected, would save all this loose screw problem and torque setting.

They could even come with the back box fixed so all you needed was a hole in the wall.

If you didn't need the 3rd (spur ) cable it could be coiled up at the back in a slightly deeper hole and used for future-proofing.
 
:troll:Hmm, using a conductive material for the socket body, using a poorer conductor for the earthing instead of copper (but upping the CSA), positioning earthing terminals in line with the route the spanner will need to take to undo the live terminals(Which MK did anyway), requiring a 47mm+ back box, I can see some problems.:prrr::crazy:

However ease of termination of my 1.5mm² spur should be easy!
Should not be any problem with connecting the cpcs.
I am still not convinced that dressing the cables in will be easy:nono:.

Good try and definitely future proofed... until they abolish the ring circuit (not so sure about present proofed!)
I will go for my 20A radial with 2.5mm² conductors.:smile:

Oh yes and it would probably look like Ferg's picture on the wall (but that is just getting people acclimatised)

You're just being picky Richard... At £34.50 each I'll sell a million!:smiley2:
 
You're just being picky Richard... At £34.50 each I'll sell a million!:smiley2:
If you can sell a million, go for it, why not, I cannot see any particular safety issues with it (apart from the conductive construction)
and I am sure that once you have your £34.5million, you probably will not care:grin:

However you have just posted your design on a public forum, so I am off to get them made!
 

Reply to manufacturer's instructions vs common sense! in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

  • Question
Thanks for your time and opinion.
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Question
Indeed, I checked and you are right. For some reason i have 40% in my memory, maybe from some other project...
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Question
This charger doesn't support rear entry from the looks, only bottom entry, hence that. Unless they make a white sheathed SWA, I would still need...
Replies
8
Views
963
  • Question
Doing a cable calc for college and need to know the ambient temperature of this circuit - Supplied from a board inside where the ambient temp is...
Replies
0
Views
975
A picture paints a thousand words so here's an SLD showing my installation and some annotations to show the proposed relocation of the DC...
Replies
12
Views
1K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks