I do agree I to a point , about putting the price so people can not afford to buy them but if everyone stop smoking today the Government will stop getting lots of money from the tax, so would have to look elsewhere to fill the Hole, you could argue that if people stopped smoking it would not be such a to dran on the nhs, my wife works at a top cancer hospital in London giving chemotherapy and a lot of patience do not smoke have had healthy lives but still got it,
This is a misguided argument, yes the goverment rakes in loads of tax from cigarettes, in fact between 2013-2014 taxation on cigarettes was 77% on the price of a pack of 20... this equates to 9.5billion into the government purse which is 2% of total revenue. Here lies the problem with using this as a key argument....
The cost to society -
Production losses from premature deaths - 3 billion
Treating smoking related issues on the nhs -2 billion
Loss of business due to smoking breaks and sickness related to smoking -6 billion
Social care cost of older smokers - 1.1billion
Costs relating from fires caused by smoking related accidents 400million
So at a glance we are looking at over 12billion and of course these figures can in some cases be contested as it can be hard to know the exact costs but they are national averaged and sampled over many years.
Now any goverment who decides to try improve the health of the nation and make it too costly to smoke will commit the goverment to a period of losses in tax revenue but after a while the financial savings overall to society will outweigh the losses + a bonus of a healthier society... we are nearing that point as the government (Labour) introduced the rolling taxation of 5% above inflation in the late nineties and it is only now starting to show the benefits to the overall health of the populous and the cost to society is falling every year now.
Don't get me wrong here I'm not Anti-smoking par-ce but do want to throw some balance into the debate ... in part to say if everyone stopped tommorow I agree the goverment would be out of pocket but a decade on and its pays for itself - the thing is though most goverments don't last more than a decade hence it took 30yrs after realising the dangers of smoking to put it into government policy to deter smokers using tax, adverts etc etc.