2395 exam question | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss 2395 exam question in the Electrician Courses : Electrical Quals area at ElectriciansForums.net

E

electric-tec

Hi All

Just thought id post this and see what the verdict is,had a couple of emails from good guys telling me ther thoughts.

Senario.. A small workshop with a canteen and toilets are wired in 70 deg single core thermoplastic cables enclosed in tubing, the light in the toilet are wired from a photcell and the fittings are flourecent, the Ze is 0.3ohms and pfc 16kA.


Q, A radial circuit fedding a heater in th office is fed from a 40A beaker the value of the combined conductors are 0.23ohms, calculate the volts drop for the circuit,

i answered. (ri+rn) x Ib = 0.23 x 40 = 9.2v

then had a brainstorm from doing previous stuff in class of adding a correction factor of 1.2 then with 5 min to go decided to change 1.2 to 1.04 as in GN3 it states 1.04 for cables that are single 70deg not enclosed or bunched or embedded so answer became 9.56v still under then after exam looked at GN3 only to find i used the 1.04 for the mv/m for cable factoring for bonding and not temperature,

So when my papers marked he will see i had 1.2 then changed to 1.04 showed all equations and calculated the percentage.

QUESTION IS do you think i will score anything or nothing was a 15 mark question ?
 
I have to disagree re using correction factors as you working out the volt drop under working conditions not fault conditions!

IMO you will not gain any marks if you changed your first answer and workings out!

Correction factors are for use when calculating that the circuit will disconnect and comply under fault conditions.
 
Upvote 0
The question that was written advised that the resistance was a measured value at an ambient temp of 20 degs.

There wasn't any reference to any mV/A/m figures from osg on the paper though
 
Upvote 0
Taken from the C and G Examiners report.

Candidates were given information related to a particular circuit and asked to determine i) the
expected voltage drop and ii) whether this value complies with the requirements of BS 7671.
Many candidates failed to make any allowance for the change in conductor temperature when
calculating the expected voltage drop.
When determining compliance a large number of
candidates failed to indicate why their conclusion was compliant or non-compliant.



So it looks like the 1.2 temp factor is to be used after all.
 
Upvote 0
hi guys everyone got mixed opinions on this one,

i must have done something correct as i passed:wink5:

i had 1.2 then changed it to 1.04

but will never know even my lecturer started questioning himself with the osg and gn3 lol
 
Upvote 0

Reply to 2395 exam question in the Electrician Courses : Electrical Quals area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
395
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
986
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
1K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

Electrical Courses

This is the main Electrical Courses at ElectriciansForums.net. Find local recommended electricians courses. Avoid training "company" scams. Always go view the training centre before booking any electrical courses.
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top