I would partially disagree that it is a pointless test.
This test really only needs to be carried out at the incoming supply to verify the rotation, either CW or CCW (most if not all of the installs I have done are CW), and is supposed to be checked at other sub boards to make sure the sequence is maintained throughout.
I have always argued that the sequence can be checked during polarity testing (a dead test) and R1+R2 testing, as by default the sequence would be correct if the continuity tests are correct, and the new GN3 elaborates further in this respect.
I can see a situation where it is impossible to do dead testing for whatever reason, and I would agree with Tony it is possible, and probably the best way, if possible, to measure the volts phase to phase and Neutral to Neutral against another known source to check the sequence is maintained, the rotation test itself would not show if this was correctly wired, as the rotation test itself does not identify the phases, only the sequence.
for instance you could have L1,L2,L3 at the source giving CW rotation, and L2,L3,L1 at a sub board, mis-wired but still giving CW rotation.
The rotation test may also be of use on pure 3 phase motor circuits, where you are faced with three un-identified (same colour etc.) conductors, say at an isolator, and you need to know which way the rotation is, especially if the motor is in an inaccessible, or in difficult to access position, or maybe where reverse rotation could be dangerous or cause damage.
So I would say, it is of limited use in certain applications, and horses for courses, provided you understand the limitations of this type of test.