- Joined
- Dec 2, 2008
- Messages
- 93
- Reaction score
- 14
Hey all.
Not been on here in ages so first off a big hello and would like to let you know that I passed my 2391. Feels really good and because of it I have been given a pay rise.
Right then, basically I feel a bit embarrassed asking as I would say that I am a bit rusty and need to get back into the knowledge of BS7671 so go easy on me guys please.
I work for a housing association and I am currently in an upstairs flat that forms part of a block that we own. Currently it is a void property and all work has to be completed etc before hand over and prior to it being relet.
Whilst doing the periodic I was performing the usual continuity tests to prove a connection to both gas and water where I found that I was getting open circuit on water.
Hmmmmm, strange this as I have already identified + proved the gas so this has to be water and I am clamped onto pipe.
So, put down a code 3 and jump into the communal loft to investigate. To my surprise I find that the 10mm to water has been cut clean. Whilst I am up there I think I better have a good look around (even though a peridoic does state that no inspections have been carried out in lofts, cables buried in walls or under flooors blar blar - using ECA forms) to see if anything else has been cut.
I don't find any more cut cables or damaged ones (thank fully) however, what I do find is a spur of the ring (via a 30A JB) going down to a 20A DP in the kitchen that is engraved "washer". This in turns feeds a twin socket outlet in the washer space (realised I need to change this to a single outlet but this was before jumping into loft).
Now, in the lounge there is a twin socket that is again a spur directly off the ring via another 30A JB so that is 2 JB's in total and 2 spurs off the ring. So, taking into account load factoring etc and of course further study of App 15 here is my question:
Is the spur of the ring supplying the washer DP acceptable?
Now, as it is a double pole isolator and not an FCU as prescribed in BS7671 then I would assume that in theory what I have here is a typical example of a "spur off a spur" scenario.
One would then suggest to simply change the DP to an FCU so that it satisfies BS7671. But, this to me leaves a problem because then aren't you making the sole purpose of a DP switch obsolete?
I mean it doesn't say in App 15 that you can supply a single or double outlet from a DP switch as only FCU is mentioned and a DP isn't fused.
Also, am I being a little to in depth here considering that this is informative only and talks from a design criteria point of view?
Not been on here in ages so first off a big hello and would like to let you know that I passed my 2391. Feels really good and because of it I have been given a pay rise.
Right then, basically I feel a bit embarrassed asking as I would say that I am a bit rusty and need to get back into the knowledge of BS7671 so go easy on me guys please.
I work for a housing association and I am currently in an upstairs flat that forms part of a block that we own. Currently it is a void property and all work has to be completed etc before hand over and prior to it being relet.
Whilst doing the periodic I was performing the usual continuity tests to prove a connection to both gas and water where I found that I was getting open circuit on water.
Hmmmmm, strange this as I have already identified + proved the gas so this has to be water and I am clamped onto pipe.
So, put down a code 3 and jump into the communal loft to investigate. To my surprise I find that the 10mm to water has been cut clean. Whilst I am up there I think I better have a good look around (even though a peridoic does state that no inspections have been carried out in lofts, cables buried in walls or under flooors blar blar - using ECA forms) to see if anything else has been cut.
I don't find any more cut cables or damaged ones (thank fully) however, what I do find is a spur of the ring (via a 30A JB) going down to a 20A DP in the kitchen that is engraved "washer". This in turns feeds a twin socket outlet in the washer space (realised I need to change this to a single outlet but this was before jumping into loft).
Now, in the lounge there is a twin socket that is again a spur directly off the ring via another 30A JB so that is 2 JB's in total and 2 spurs off the ring. So, taking into account load factoring etc and of course further study of App 15 here is my question:
Is the spur of the ring supplying the washer DP acceptable?
Now, as it is a double pole isolator and not an FCU as prescribed in BS7671 then I would assume that in theory what I have here is a typical example of a "spur off a spur" scenario.
One would then suggest to simply change the DP to an FCU so that it satisfies BS7671. But, this to me leaves a problem because then aren't you making the sole purpose of a DP switch obsolete?
I mean it doesn't say in App 15 that you can supply a single or double outlet from a DP switch as only FCU is mentioned and a DP isn't fused.
Also, am I being a little to in depth here considering that this is informative only and talks from a design criteria point of view?