An interesting read on RCD’s | Page 2 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss An interesting read on RCD’s in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

any more expertise on this chaps and chapettes? ive actually looked through a few catalogues and they don't even list what type of rcd they are in most of them!

A PV circuit shouldn't share the same RCD as other final circuits anyway. As the required disconnection times will probably not be achieved.

so its just the one on that circuit that needs to be the b+? rest of installation is normal?

I've spoken to 5 other electricians this week, nobody had come across or been taught this either!
 
No trip tests are conducted by saturating the trip coil on A and A.C. type RCD/RCBOs with d.c. current.
The No trip test (as far as I am aware) will not function on B type RCD/RCBOs.
With p.v. installations, the Inverter manual should tell you which type of RCD/RCBOs are required.
If the manual states B type RCD/RCBOs are required, then it will apply to all RCD/RCBOs used in the Installation.
A and A.C. type RCD/RCBOs will still operate, as long as there is no d.c. current from the p.v. saturating the trip coil.
 
any more expertise on this chaps and chapettes? ive actually looked through a few catalogues and they don't even list what type of rcd they are in most of them!



so its just the one on that circuit that needs to be the b+? rest of installation is normal?

I've spoken to 5 other electricians this week, nobody had come across or been taught this either!
The inverter can take up to 5seconds to disconnect so if the circuits on the same RCD require a maximum of 0.4 seconds disconnection then you can't guarantee this will be achieved. For the use of type B RCD's with PV then refer to reg 712.411.3.2.1.1 same With vehicle charging points may require a type B RCD 722.531.2.101.
 
The references to USB sockets and most types of SMPSUs associated with networking etc seems to be a red herring, as they must provide electrical separation between the AC input and DC output. Therefore, they are no more likely to inject a DC current into the circuit conductors that would saturate and disable a type AC RCD, than any other electronic load. On an SELV supply, there would have to be an input-output fault (nasty, possibly live iPhone!) as well as a fault to earth from the other side of the DC supply, and the unit would still have to carry on functioning to produce the offending DC. Possible, but in practice the whole thing would likely blow to smithereens and no longer generate DC. The input rectifier of an SMPSU can produce a DC load if one side of the non-separated DC bus leaks to earth and one leg of the bridge blows out (or it's half-wave), but this should not result in shock because the electrical separation remains, so it doesn't rely on the RCD for protection. It could disable the RCD from protecting against other faults, but again the 99% likely result is that the bridge will simply short out completely and blow the internal fuse / circuit OCPD, leaving the RCD to function normally.

Phase-angle controlled loads are more likely to have a DC component in their supply current and there were, maybe still are, appliances that deliberately produce one. For example, hairdryers with two heat settings that use a diode to halve the element mean current, draw their entire load as DC on low heat. Does this prevent operation of a traditional type AC RCD? I would think it probably does, without there even being a fault. I would actually like to try this (anyone care to do it?) Put a half-wave low heat thingy on a type AC and run a normal RCD test?

I'm familiar with RCD selection on the basis of DC and HF load current components from theatrical and machine installations. Large lighting dimmers can produce a significant DC component in their supply current, especially in the event of an output device fault leading to half-wave loads of many amps. For these, a type A may provide adequate protection, but for a device that can fault from the DC buss of a non-separated bridge rectified mains supply, e.g. an inverter, the smooth-DC sensitivity of a type B is needed.

In summary, yes, food for thought if you're not familiar with DC-sensitivity of RCDs, but I am not fully in agreement with some of the comments.
 

Reply to An interesting read on RCD’s in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
391
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
975
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
1K

Similar threads

  • Question
Obviously not a building/DIY forum so will keep it short but yes - we've taken all the floors up. Several joists in the bathroom need doing as...
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Question
Hello Dave, Thanks for taking the time to reply. I appreciate the info, I haven't updated this post yet, but I have since been talking to some...
Replies
3
Views
1K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top