One of my (foreign) customers flew his father over last week so he could benefit from the NHS "as he was here on holiday".
I've never denied that health tourism exists, we all know it does but what is your answer to it?
Mine is very simple, no one who is not a resident here gets in to the country without adequate health insurance.
 
I've never denied that health tourism exists, we all know it does but what is your answer to it?
Mine is very simple, no one who is not a resident here gets in to the country without adequate health insurance.
I don't think there is on answer. My misses works in the NHS and they often get "tourists" - but she has no idea if they pay up later or not. You can't ask a woman in labour to wait can you, and often they are out the same day!
 
If the NHS wants to save money it should our source procurement to Sainsburys or Tesco's - those guys know how to drive down purchase prices, whereas public sector buyers haven't got a clue.......
 
I've never denied that health tourism exists, we all know it does but what is your answer to it?
Mine is very simple, no one who is not a resident here gets in to the country without adequate health insurance.

My thoughts exactly. Travel insurance is a fraction of the cost of a flight (on a decent airline anyway!)

Edit: I have posted previously about this and am not against people, no matter where they're from, getting treatment if needed. It is a 'drop in the ocean'

Think this could go on and on and I type too slow!!! will keep watching peoples opinions as we all seem to want the same thing really
 
Last edited by a moderator:
How do other countries do it? As you say, you can't turn away a pregnant woman giving birth, or someone who's unconscious at the side of the road can't tell you if they've got the money to pay.
 
If she's that far gone on her pregnancy what's she doing taking a holiday in a foreign country?
I thought established medical advice was that pregnant women should avoid long distance travel, especially overseas and/or by air?
 
Apply the same theory to education and we're all back in Victorian England.

Better discipline and an understanding of what respect actually is wouldn't be a bad thing

I don't think there is on answer. My misses works in the NHS and they often get "tourists" - but she has no idea if they pay up later or not. You can't ask a woman in labour to wait can you, and often they are out the same day!

A mate of mine had an accident at a peage in France his daughter was taken to hospital kept in overnight and was not discharged until the bill was paid and the longer you delayed the bill went up as they couldn't use the room for another patient until she was discharged
 
Better discipline and an understanding of what respect actually is wouldn't be a bad thing
Discipline by fear is nothing but fear, nor is it respect. It is the job of parents to teach their children what is acceptable and what is not, a school's job is to educate.
How about this, a teacher in our school was what I'd call cane happy, even the most minor infractions would be violently punished. Eventually, after a series of complaints the police got involved and he was prosecuted for assault on several children.
This prosecution resulted in a conviction and a jail term. Discuss.
Another thing, suppose I don't like the way your child is behaving. Is it acceptable for me to beat him or her? If not, why is it acceptable for a teacher to do so?
Regarding the Victorian thing. The good old days, rickets, diptheria, cholera, child prostitution, no workplace laws etc etc. Great wasn't it?
 
As with most things it's about striking a balance - unfortunately now we seem to have a generation of parents who not only can't be bothered to bring up their children with a sense of discipline but seem to think it's the schools' responsibility to do everything from toilet training them to teaching them to integrate into society without so much as a raised voice while the little terrors run amok with the full backing of the parents and grandparents.

Same with benefits - no government can be seen to take a line so hard as 'you had the kids, now you figure out how you're going to bring them up and pay for them', but at the same time making having as many children as possible a career option is unsustainable and irresponsible.

Same with the NHS - 'taking a percentage of earnings from those deemed to be able to afford it to pay for free healthcare for all' might be a socially responsible idea, but it has to be remembered someone has to pay for it. Those who rarely use the service will only be comfortable paying in so much, so the service needs to be restricted to those entitled to it, ie the natural percentage of the population who need it so much they are genuinely unable to pay into the system (the disabled), without increasing that population by shipping them in from other countries just for the healthcare (health tourism), malingerers using the NHS as a form of free entertainment without paying anything in, or those who get drunk and fall over then expect the NHS to pick up the pieces.
 

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Green 2 Go Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses Heating 2 Go Electrician Workwear Supplier
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread starter

Joined
Location
South West, Bath
What type of forum member are you?
Practising Electrician (Qualified - Domestic or Commercial etc)

Thread Information

Title
Anyone aware of this!!!
Prefix
N/A
Forum
Electrician Talk Forum
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
91

Thread Tags

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
Simonslimline,
Last reply from
jaypp,
Replies
91
Views
7,642

Advert

Back
Top