As Markie tongue in cheek wrote the regs are a wonderful tool for interpretation.
I think 99% of sparks would class a domestic installation as "simple" in this case, though quite a few can become complicated in today's market place.
The biggest concern would be cost. Every installation would have to literally be unique to every home, you could produce a generic drawing I suppose and then tweak it to fit each individual installation but it would still need to be produced.
I use to and would produce in cad a very basic drawing showing each room with utilized points such as position of sockets in the room, position of data/telephone points, and lights with a legend of cable sizes and position of the protection way in the CU and it's size.
I then if I were doing a CU change produce a front elevation of the CU showing all the protection devices and their values, with simple lines representing the circuits coming out of the CU and destination of the circuit and type of circuit ie RFC, Radial, lighting etc,
This was all done as part of the cost, often absorbed virtually free of charge as part of the quote, and IMO just looks so much more professional. It would also get someone use to doing drawing, however crude that are required in commercial. industrial which are often not classed as "simple"
Think the bottom line to this is really cost. I would imagine in today's prices to produce a full set of blue print drawings for an electrical installation of a average house would cost 200-300 pounds and so it is deemed perhaps not commercially viable, hence reg 514.9.1 and the "get out". Also rarely would you find commercial/industrial drawings "kept fresh", so could you imagine ever finding a domestic one.