Bonding conductor in armour? | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Bonding conductor in armour? in the Electrician Talk | All Countries area at ElectriciansForums.net

Joined
Jun 18, 2008
Messages
366
Reaction score
14
When running a new feed in armour, that will also require a bonding conductor over the same run, is there a problem with buying armour with an extra core and using one of those? I only ask as I've only ever seen a separate green and yellow zip tied to the side of the armour, if you're using 2 cores and the sheath as your earth, why not buy 3 core and use the other core as your bond?

I suppose it's meant to be unbroken and it would be rare in commercial setups that the armour going in is running from the MET right to where the services come in at the other end
 
No problem with using a spare core as earth. Assuming its CSA is adequate for the purpose.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I suppose it's meant to be unbroken and it would be rare in commercial setups that the armour going in is running from the MET right to where the services come in at the other end

Do you mean as a cpc or a protective bonding conductor?
 
As in the post, bonding conductor. Will be 3 phase + neutral so thinking 5 core and using one of the cores as the bond for gas and water and the sheath as main earth
 
You have to run individual cables/cores for Main Bonding Conductors, dont you?

So a 6c SWA would be required.

This is what I need to look up. We're looking at a 16mm 3 phase feed, 50A per phase so I'm thinking might be easier to use 4 core 16mm for the 3 and neutral, sheath for the earth and a separate 10mm for the bond. Both services are within a meter of each other and the MET is about 40 metres away so don't want to drag another cable over there unnecessarily to bond each one separately. I can't find anything in the book stating that each must have it's own. I'm thinking trying to use a spare core (or cores) will be too much of a faff and waste meters of the other conductors as we'd have to cut them back to get the length for the bonding conductor.
 
Personally, I'd install a separate protective bonding conductor-you can pick up both services if the conductor remains unbroken.

This means that any future alterations to the 3-phase item still leave the main protective bonding intact.
 

Reply to Bonding conductor in armour? in the Electrician Talk | All Countries area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

A picture paints a thousand words so here's an SLD showing my installation and some annotations to show the proposed relocation of the DC...
Replies
12
Views
1K
I am living in the north of Thailand where the grid is very unreliable (rainy season outages multiple times per week or once a full week). I...
Replies
0
Views
362
There is simply too much to think about to even suggest cable sizes for this project. I must agree with my colleagues about involving an...
Replies
5
Views
2K
Why has it got a banjo outside as well as a bolt through ? I've never been a fan of drilling extra holes for no real benefit that I can think of...
    • Like
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • Question
Youre in the same boat as me. I was previously with niceic and later on, napit. No issues. I didn't bother finishing my nvq3 as in 2010 during the...
Replies
7
Views
3K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks