M
Martyc
After spending 3 hours drawing wiring diagrams in my workbook (only started 2365 level 2 in sept) it made me think about 2 real life scenarios that have made me think (dangerous I know) that I'm sure both answers are simple and I'm over-thinking them. Here they are;
1) a friend is changing virtually all the light fittings in his house to light/ fan units, he asked me to do it as he knows I'm at college, I declined as don't want to start messing with people's houses yet. But with this situation is it satisfactory to have the fan supplied by the lighting circuit and would any modifications have to be made to accommodate the extra demand of the fans? My personal view is: depends on the number of lamps on the circuit, is there sufficient capacity to accommodate the extra demand (I.e if the whole house is on a single circuit for lighting, it may be too much and have to be split into upstairs/downstairs circuits to accommodate potential demand).
2) I have a galley style kitchen, at the end of which is a downstairs toilet and utility room. There is a switch for the kitchen light by the kitchen entrance, and a single pull cord switch by the utility room door for the utility room and toilet in both of which there is a batten type lamp holder. If I turn on the kitchen light I can't turn on the utility/toilet light, but I can if it is switched off. The house is pretty old, and so is the wiring, but I can't think of any reason why it would purposely be wired this way. Would there be any reason why it would be wired this way (only reason I can think of would be to stop all lamps being on at once to reduce maximum load on circuit but seems daft!), and also how would it be likely to have been done? I can only think of the kitchen switch being a 2 way switch hence lighting working the way it does, but I haven't investigated yet.
Sorry for the essay, and sounding like a complete flid, but if you don't ask, you don't know (I tried googling but didn't seem to answer much) and I'd like to know how far off the mark my train of thought is!
1) a friend is changing virtually all the light fittings in his house to light/ fan units, he asked me to do it as he knows I'm at college, I declined as don't want to start messing with people's houses yet. But with this situation is it satisfactory to have the fan supplied by the lighting circuit and would any modifications have to be made to accommodate the extra demand of the fans? My personal view is: depends on the number of lamps on the circuit, is there sufficient capacity to accommodate the extra demand (I.e if the whole house is on a single circuit for lighting, it may be too much and have to be split into upstairs/downstairs circuits to accommodate potential demand).
2) I have a galley style kitchen, at the end of which is a downstairs toilet and utility room. There is a switch for the kitchen light by the kitchen entrance, and a single pull cord switch by the utility room door for the utility room and toilet in both of which there is a batten type lamp holder. If I turn on the kitchen light I can't turn on the utility/toilet light, but I can if it is switched off. The house is pretty old, and so is the wiring, but I can't think of any reason why it would purposely be wired this way. Would there be any reason why it would be wired this way (only reason I can think of would be to stop all lamps being on at once to reduce maximum load on circuit but seems daft!), and also how would it be likely to have been done? I can only think of the kitchen switch being a 2 way switch hence lighting working the way it does, but I haven't investigated yet.
Sorry for the essay, and sounding like a complete flid, but if you don't ask, you don't know (I tried googling but didn't seem to answer much) and I'd like to know how far off the mark my train of thought is!