This has probably come up before but I cant seem to find it. I have been presented with an EICR produced by another company where they have put a code 3 down for using the sheath of mineral insulated cables as the CPC. No further explanation on the observations and recomendations sheet. No requirement for bonding (its on final circuits), cross sectional area of sheath is fine, no sign of degredation, dead and live test readings low.

I dont understand why they have done this? Am I missing something? The client wants the cables replaced because of this report..........so it is an issue. Any help or insights are appreciated. Thanks in advance.
 
perfectly normal to use the copper sheath of MICC as cpc. that's what it's for (as well as offering the best mechanical protection ). the guy who coded it is an arse. assuming that it's correctly glanded and readings are acceptable.
 
Moron. (Not you, the code 3 test monkey)
Of course the sheath is cpc. You get 2 core MICC for a feed and neutral, where does he think the cpc comes from?
Some of the pots come with earth tails soldered onto for goodness sake.
 
I've seen C2 for missing labels in the past, I'd hate to see what that particular clown would have coded the MICC CPC...
 
As others have said No code required ( as long as its terminated correctly)I,ve just had one today Code 1 for exposed bus bar inside a DB , Code 2 for no mixed wiring colour sticker ,Code 1 for a bit trunking lid missing , Code 2 for no DB chart ,the list goes on
 
Thanks for all the replys. He hasn't coded anything else, just about 10 C3's, one for each MI circuit . He wasn't a complete numpty as he did not C2 this and assess as unsatifactory thank god, but the client is twitchy because they are a local authority and the current climate means the words 'improvement recomended' make them worry about risks to tennants! I am going to go back and reasure him.
 
I bet he looked at it and firstly called the scrap man to see the value of MICC and then worked out his price for replacing it all bloody chancer!!
 
Thanks for all the replys. He hasn't coded anything else, just about 10 C3's, one for each MI circuit . He wasn't a complete numpty as he did not C2 this and assess as unsatifactory thank god, but the client is twitchy because they are a local authority and the current climate means the words 'improvement recomended' make them worry about risks to tennants! I am going to go back and reasure him.
Is matey a real electrician, or a plastic one?
 
Toilet paper EICR, no requirement to change anything, no code unless incorrectly terminated.
Just ignore the idiot who did the EICR, they are incompetent.
 
Would be nice to know if he went down this route and any response, if any were given.
 
The " electrician" that coded the MICC is a dipstick, your customer who wants all the cable replaced is also a dipstick, never in my working life have I heard such a load of old BS. Get hold of Mr Muppet the sparks who coded the MICC and ask him politely in front of the Chap who paid good money for the duff EICR to explain his reasoning, guarantee you he will make a complete fool of himself, he ought to be ashamed of himself, sell his tools, stop paying whatever scam he belongs to, and take up Plumbing. Sorry one more thing are there any Zs readings for these "non-earthed" circuits?
 
Last edited:
more thing are there any Zs readings for these "non-earthed" circuits?
He has C3 coded it as the copper sheath is used as the cpc, the only explanation that I can think of is corrosion to the sheath due to the environment but thats why you have the PVC over sheath.
 
Reading back over #9 where the OP says the client is a Local Authority, makes me wonder what sort of technical people they employ, someone must have realised that the Guy doing the testing has made a monumental cockup, in coding the install as he had.
 
Reading back over #9 where the OP says the client is a Local Authority, makes me wonder what sort of technical people they employ, someone must have realised that the Guy doing the testing has made a monumental cockup, in coding the install as he had.
it's a local authority, Pete. anyone sees it , they'll pass it on to another desk for fear of being branded racist/sexist/or tried for sexual harrasment/discrimination.
 
it's a local authority, Pete. anyone sees it , they'll pass it on to another desk for fear of being branded racist/sexist/or tried for sexual harrasment/discrimination.
Not my problem so I'll pass it on syndrome then?
 
It's not one of the jobs Pete was at when he was an apprentice and was sent to polish the MICC's must have polished to enthusiastically and has reduced the CSA of the sheath. Tin hat on.
 
It's not one of the jobs Pete was at when he was an apprentice and was sent to polish the MICC's must have polished to enthusiastically and has reduced the CSA of the sheath. Tin hat on.
Never said I polished the MICC enthusiastically Ant, a quick rub to get rid of the patina, and that's it.
 

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Green 2 Go Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses Heating 2 Go
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread starter

Joined
Location
Bristol

Thread Information

Title
Code 3 for usign Sheath of MICC as CPC
Prefix
N/A
Forum
Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
30

Thread Tags

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
JameZZZ,
Last reply from
Pete999,
Replies
30
Views
6,568

Advert

Back
Top