OP
stewart
wouldnt it of been better to do the research prior to the change? or gain a working knowledge of the regulations?
and i agree that GStueyXR Must stop with his constant advertising campaing
Yes, it is always better to be prepared, and I thought I was. Of course one has to be open minded and be prepared to accept that one can lag behind the regulations. Being complacent is not an excuse for poor workmanship. But when you are dealing with Clients sometimes the best approach is one of compromise and let's be honest, if I do my work properly it will definitely be an enhancement.
So, there I was complacently sitting and reviewing the IEE regs when I hear this innocent comment, "The IEE regs dictate that at least 2 rcd's have to be fitted for a CU to comply..." Well blow me down with a feather but upon querying it it was confirmed (though no proof was offered)
Now, I'm not exactly wet behind the ears nor am I ignorant of the regulations so I wants to find out where in the regs I am out of touch. Sadly there is no such proof, only a 'necessary' adjunct ............