Disconnection Times | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Disconnection Times in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

B

brizospark

I've always wondered why BS7671 states that a disconnection time of 0.4s is required for circuits NOT exceeding 32A and for circuits exceeding 32A it is 5s

Surely you would want the higher current to trip quicker?

Can someone clarify this?
 
I've always wondered why BS7671 states that a disconnection time of 0.4s is required for circuits NOT exceeding 32A and for circuits exceeding 32A it is 5s

Surely you would want the higher current to trip quicker?

Can someone clarify this?

It was explained to me like this:-

First you need to understand that the 5 second and 1 second times (TT) are not based on the touch voltage curve.

They represent achievable values in that such disconnection times can be met.

Consider a TN system - we are addicted to the use of overcurrent protective devices for fault protection. This requires a substantial current flow to operate the device in a reasonable time. If we consider high current circuits, such as distribution circuits rated at say, 100OA, we need a very low impedance to allow sufficient current to flow to operate the overcurrent device. If we want to operate it quickly this impedance must be as low as possible.

We start to reach the limits with these high current circuits and all we can do is extend the disconnection time to try and make things fit.

5 seconds is a reasonably short time to allow a dangerous voltage to exist on a circuit that is unlikely to actually be in a fault state. i.e. A high current distribution or final circuit is usually fairly robust and faults are not very likely. If a fault should occur there is only a small probability that some one would actually be touching the circuit. Contrast this to a small final circuit that might be supplying something that we actually hold on to such as a power tool.

We could get round this by using RCD or similar technology for fault protection but we usually don't http://www.------.org/forums/forum/i/expressions/face-icon-small-shocked.gif.

TT is a different problem - we are already using RCD's or similar but we need a reasonable time span to achieve discrimination over a large installation. This can mean the use of instant, fixed time delay and adjustable time delay devices in series. 1 Second gives us the required time span.
 
Fantastic in depth answer

thank you IQ!!!;)

So am I correct in saying that any circuit in a TN installation that does not exceed 32A should be 0.4s and above 32A should be 5s?
 
What about a cooker circuit rated 40 amp with a socket on the cooker control ? :)


interesting..... be first to admit, i don't know the answer to this one. however, i would be inclined to enter 5secs. on a test sheet.
 
interesting..... be first to admit, i don't know the answer to this one. however, i would be inclined to enter 5secs. on a test sheet.

Exactly, no distinction between sockets and fixed equipment anymore
 
Fantastic in depth answer

thank you IQ!!!;)

So am I correct in saying that any circuit in a TN installation that does not exceed 32A should be 0.4s and above 32A should be 5s?

Yes, but also distribution circuits are at 5s too.
 
The exception could be the rcd disconnection time for ordinary persons (40mS)
 
I would say 5s as it is the fixed wiring you are protecting and a 40A cooker circuit should have a feed of 10mm realistically. If there is a problem with whatever you are plugging in to the attached skt then surely the fuse in the plug is considered the primary protective device
 
Alright Socket Outlet 0.4 with Additional RCD protection.

Yes, as I said above but the disconnection time on the schedule of test results would still be recorded as 5 seconds whether the installation was under control of instructed/skilled persons or not.
I have a mail from IET technical help confirming this, I'll see if I can dig it out!
 

Reply to Disconnection Times in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
291
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
798
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
828

Similar threads

thats not what was stated though... they say the ocpd exceeds the ccc of the circuit... which to me means the cable. Loads can be disconnected/...
Replies
4
Views
467
Yes, probably overthinkig, thanks.
Replies
6
Views
599

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top