Hi Midwest,Yes it does seem nonsensical.
I think the whole drive for regulating who should carry out electrical work, via Part P, was to stop untrained & unqualified people carrying out electrical work, in domestic properties. You don't see or hear many 'YouTube' trained companies working in the commercial or industrial market place.
Our OP's thread has proved aspects of Part P have not worked, no offence to OP.
Its the drive some people have to save money, is where we are. I hear same people say they can't trust traders to do their work, and are only confident in themselves carrying out the work. Poor state of affairs, where we can't legislate about poor trades people and those who what to save money, perhaps to the detriment of others.
I partly agree with this and no offence taken.
My thread wasn't really about this but it's gone there on its own.
I think the LA issue is historical: they were originally supposed to provide qualified inspectors which we (non-professional electrical enthusiasts) could employ to certify our work. About 10 years ago Brighton and Hove said they couldn't afford the inspectors and ceased the service. The LA recommended I employ an independent electrician to certify my work but in my experience no electrician will do this even for fully documented and accessible work...
So my inability to have my work assessed and passed has effectively prevented me from working legally on my own home which was not the intention of the law. So in some ways I see the LA's stance on my current project (2.5 years 'Grand Design') a more acceptable approach but it's only available to me under the umbrella of a very large Building Control application.
So if there are any electricians out there that fancy a trip down to Hove (Brighton) to certify my work which is currently all accessible then get in touch... I need an EICR for my BC too. I'd greatly enjoy the opportunity to discuss the whole installation.