EICR Test Results mostly left blank

[Dave Jenkins]

Mornin'
I did a small job for a client earlier in the week and told her I need to complete a Minor Works cert - as you do..
She said that she didn't need one because she had this - waving an EICR under my nose.
Looking through the document, it all looked good until the last page - test results. All of the Continuity and IR boxes were marked N/R. All the other boxes for all the circuits were OK.
So I did my MWC and departed.
Thinking about it, not carrying out all the circuits tests for an EICR isn't something I'd do but is it necessarily incorrect? Guidance Note 3 suggests it's up to the tester to decide what tests are appropriate - thorough testing of circuits versus introducing wiring faults during the tests....
Do you all fill all of the boxes for every EICR.
PS..takes me all day to do an EICR but I note there's some 'electricians' claim to do multiple EICRs per day...
What do you think?

 

[The Ghost]

You should fill in all the boxes. Unless it has been specifically agreed with the person ordering the work as to being limitations. However such a blank form would be worthless. If someone spotted it they may reject it as being valid in a sale of the house. And what is N/R?

 

[grimysparks80]

Depends on the information available already. If you do a PIR on a house with no previous paperwork you have to test everything or how can you say its satisfactory. If previous test results are available (almost never in a house) then you can take a selection which should be agreed with the customer.

Id say that report is worthless. How can he know if the cpcs or the ring circuits are intact?

 

[1Justin]

Keep a record of the person who did the EICR. Tell the customer. - Not that you can do anything with it mind you.
Perhaps making it public on these forums that they are being noted might make some pull their socks up. I have about four in this category. More or less blank ( or completely wrong) EICR. Satisfies many landlords though.
A domestic EICR on an old house is an exhausting full-on day. I'd often be still writing it up at 11pm or next day.

 

[Dave Jenkins]

A domestic EICR on an old house is an exhausting full-on day. I'd often be still writing it up at 11pm or next day.

Glad you've said that - thought it was me being slow!

 

[Toneyz]

An EICR should not be done as just a tick box exercise for a house sale, commercial H & S file with the minimum done it is designed to be done for a very good reason.

 

[Octopus]

An EICR with most of the boxes not completed isn't worth the paper its written / printed on.....

I tend to provide the link to the Best Practice Guide No 4 ....

 

[Deleted member 9648]

There is not always a need to do R1+R2 tests, this is really an initial verification test and the installation is already energised. If a previous EIC or EICR records Zs/R1+R2 test results and the new Zs tests compare then there is no point in time consuming and disruptive dead tests. An experienced inspector could also predict what Zs values are likely on a circuit and if the measured results are favourable then that's good enough. At the end of the day it is the Zs result that we are interested in to confirm ADS and polarity can be confirmed by means other than R1+R2. In many instances it is not practical to IR test each final circuit and a global test which gives a satisfactory reading is sufficient. If I do a global test I'll record the value on the first line of the schedule only and it will explained elsewhere.
So that's a lot of lims or boxes not filled in, but not an indication of a shoddy report, just common sense being exercised.

 

[1Justin]

"There is not always a need to do R1+R2 tests, this is really an initial verification test and the installation is already energised."
Potentially true, but that's coming from a nice starting position. I get called out (and by the sound of it the OP) to do EICR on shoddy old places which have NEVER had any certificate, with mixed wiring from 60's, 70's and shoddy DIY bodges and downlights during 1980/90s. Plus kitchen fitters have been in since ! (need I say more).- And landlords are letting these out.

 

[Deleted member 9648]

"There is not always a need to do R1+R2 tests, this is really an initial verification test and the installation is already energised."
Potentially true, but that's coming from a nice starting position. I get called out (and by the sound of it the OP) to do EICR on shoddy old places which have NEVER had any certificate, with mixed wiring from 60's, 70's and shoddy DIY bodges and downlights during 1980/90s. Plus kitchen fitters have been in since ! (need I say more).- And landlords are letting these out.

Which is why I didn't say "There is never a need...."

The point I was making is that an incompletely filled schedule is not necessarily a sign of a bad report.

 

[cliffed]

There’s no excuse on any domestic property to do the usual tests

 

[Deleted member 26818]

Guess it depends on what the usual tests are.

 

[Octopus]

There’s no excuse on any domestic property to do the usual tests

did you miss out the word "not"?

 

[cliffed]

Thanks not to do...opps

 

[HappyHippyDad]

I agree with Wirepuller here.
I always have a chat with the homeowner before hand (and send an email confirming what I will be testing) and usually L/N -E IR each circuit and ZS each circuit, but thinking about it a global IR would be ok. However, I quite like the idea of having individual IR results for each circuit (but not L-N unless the homeowner wants that during our chat) as you can pinpoint any deterioration more easily over the years.