W
wattsup
Major mump
Energy saving light bulbs do not compete with incandescent lamps. It is nigh on impossible to make a decorative statement using said **** lamps.
They the ‘dodgy government’ do not compare like with like.
I’m also not convinced with statements like 10 x cheaper…err nope. By the time I go to the bog, kitchen etc for a few minutes and turn on the light, its just getting warm by the time I switch off. That is not good, full benefit is not reached until ‘warmed’. So should I leave the light/s on all the time? Thus nullifying the cost saving?
Not to mention the +5x cost in the first place for the lamp for less light
I’ve done a few jobs lately where, Eco warriors have installed flu lamps rather than evil incandescent lamps and completely stuffed their dimmer circuits, yep dimmer no good, pay me £150.00 blah just to tell them, err nope do not use energy savers on dimmer circuits. I’m not kidding, how Eco friendly is that?
The government are as usual pandering and knee jerking to something they have no knowledge:-- to tree huggers., because they think there are votes in it.
Added to all the green ****e, flu have mercury, no problem right now because small numbers, but guess what in a few years when flu’s are the only option…the mercury police will be watching your bin, you cannot dispose of with normal household rubbish. The mercury tax will emerge …I ain’t kidding.
Added to all that I hate this government, mainly because most, if not all are bent and are hypocrites beyond belief.
You can do anything you want with incandescent lamps, décor, flood etc
Flu, shine it up ya arse and look for a shadow much too dim
Led’s may be the way to go, especially for décor effect, but please don’t say they are the same watt for watt in actual light output they are not. The flu guys say 11watts are equal to 60 watt incandescent, oh no they are not and should be sued for such statements. They do not compare like for like.
As always they spin the actual science, when it suits the suits.
End of mump!
Energy saving light bulbs do not compete with incandescent lamps. It is nigh on impossible to make a decorative statement using said **** lamps.
They the ‘dodgy government’ do not compare like with like.
I’m also not convinced with statements like 10 x cheaper…err nope. By the time I go to the bog, kitchen etc for a few minutes and turn on the light, its just getting warm by the time I switch off. That is not good, full benefit is not reached until ‘warmed’. So should I leave the light/s on all the time? Thus nullifying the cost saving?
Not to mention the +5x cost in the first place for the lamp for less light
I’ve done a few jobs lately where, Eco warriors have installed flu lamps rather than evil incandescent lamps and completely stuffed their dimmer circuits, yep dimmer no good, pay me £150.00 blah just to tell them, err nope do not use energy savers on dimmer circuits. I’m not kidding, how Eco friendly is that?
The government are as usual pandering and knee jerking to something they have no knowledge:-- to tree huggers., because they think there are votes in it.
Added to all the green ****e, flu have mercury, no problem right now because small numbers, but guess what in a few years when flu’s are the only option…the mercury police will be watching your bin, you cannot dispose of with normal household rubbish. The mercury tax will emerge …I ain’t kidding.
Added to all that I hate this government, mainly because most, if not all are bent and are hypocrites beyond belief.
You can do anything you want with incandescent lamps, décor, flood etc
Flu, shine it up ya arse and look for a shadow much too dim
Led’s may be the way to go, especially for décor effect, but please don’t say they are the same watt for watt in actual light output they are not. The flu guys say 11watts are equal to 60 watt incandescent, oh no they are not and should be sued for such statements. They do not compare like for like.
As always they spin the actual science, when it suits the suits.
End of mump!
