I have been asked to do some maintenance for a small co-operative horticulture set-up. They operate on a shoe-string, and have a couple of hectares of land in a low-lying flat area.
The DNO has given them a PMR system with a service head and meter in nearby woodland. (Ze 0.23). I find a 30mA RCD main switch and 16A breaker, from where the supply runs in (probably 2.5mm) SWA (which is flopped onto the surface, becoming less visible over time..) to an earth-floored shed some ~ 100M away. At shed there are a couple of sockets for kettle/fridge (Zs 1.75).
In addition to advising them to bury the cable safely, I could:
A) Leave the PMR as it is.
B) Convert to TT (not sensible it seems to me, since they have decent PMR at source, - although a long way off.
C) To add back-up earth electrode(s) at the shed, (@ < 200 Ohm), I guess effectively extending the PMR. Not much fault current would go that way versus 1.75 Ohms, but as a back-up?
Given this operation will continue with or without my intervention, should safety favour A, B or C?
The DNO has given them a PMR system with a service head and meter in nearby woodland. (Ze 0.23). I find a 30mA RCD main switch and 16A breaker, from where the supply runs in (probably 2.5mm) SWA (which is flopped onto the surface, becoming less visible over time..) to an earth-floored shed some ~ 100M away. At shed there are a couple of sockets for kettle/fridge (Zs 1.75).
In addition to advising them to bury the cable safely, I could:
A) Leave the PMR as it is.
B) Convert to TT (not sensible it seems to me, since they have decent PMR at source, - although a long way off.
C) To add back-up earth electrode(s) at the shed, (@ < 200 Ohm), I guess effectively extending the PMR. Not much fault current would go that way versus 1.75 Ohms, but as a back-up?
Given this operation will continue with or without my intervention, should safety favour A, B or C?