First CU change - high R1+R2 reading and other problems! | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss First CU change - high R1+R2 reading and other problems! in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

M

Marcosparco

Hi Hope someone can put me on the right track here as I'm going in circles.

Ok I set out to do a straightforward CU change (at home) for my ELECSA assesment - or so I thought. I'm fairly happy with testing on new circuits but these are around 15 years old.

My overall question is what level of pre work PIR is required, how much is required to be put right v's flagged with appropriate code for a CU change?

Did what I thought was the right thing and did some pre work tests and got the following issues.

1. Polarity issue at one socket - now corrected
2. 2 way switch not working - now fixed
3. Poor ins resistance in ring, but >1 Mohm, so I believe this is within limits although advise further investigation.
4. Socket positioned over sink in celler/utility area.
5. 2 light switch backboxes too shallow to allow face plate to be tightened up fully
6. missing earths to backboxes
7. looks like 6mm main bonding to gas and no label
and last but not least....
8. R1+R2 on the one ring circuit is too high (3.59 ohm).

As it's my home I'm happy putting these right as required, but where do you draw the line, especially if it is for a customer unwilling to pay for extra work?

In some ways its good this was not straightforward ( ie typical of CU changes!?), but I'm getting bogged down, so any advice would be much appreciated thanks!

Mark
 
reading your post, it looks as if you've got it all under control. item 6. though, backbox earthing is not obligatory, just a matter of personal preference. the high R1+R2 needs investigating however. could be anything from a poor connection in a socket, to a JB. likewise the low IR reading. check all sockets, look for damp.
 
Last edited:
Marco,

Item 8, are you doing the test correctly? Dont wish to insult you but it easy to cock it up. Been there and done it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
double check your continuity readings. make sure your leads are nulled, squeeze the crocs , and your s/c at the CU end are good.
 
Just make sure you note on your Cert that although the Ins Res is >1 mohm if it is less than 2 that it may require further investigation. I was asked why I hadn't on my Assesment
 
What were your end to end continuity readings on the ring?

The back boxes don't require an earth lead if they are the 'one fixed lug' type.

The socket position is more a building regulations item but you could just list it as a deviation in the appropriate box on the electrical installation certificate.
 
Thanks for all the replies, it never ceases to amaze me how helpful people are and how quickly they respond to questions.

Update:

Its a TNS system - so does 6mm main bonding need to be changed or coded 3/4?

ok I have to embarrass myself now. R1+R2 = (r1+r2)/4 was finally explained to us at college last night!
r1 = 0.83
r2 = 2.76
rn = 0.85

R1+R2 = 1.09 (measured previously but now treated correctly) however still too high.
Measured Ze is 0.13, so should I be using this or the suppliers figure? I've used 0800 195 1452 t contact UU previously, but it no longer connects - is there a new number or should I be ringing Eon?

Thanks again,

Mark
 
you need to sort out the bad cpc connection, make sure the cpc's are not twisted together and are secured at each faceplate correctly, no point doing r1/r2 until you sort r2. what size cpc is it 1.5 or 1mm? ze 0.13 is fine for tns no need to ring anyone use this figure. bonds should be 10mm. main earth shoud be 16mm
 
Thanks hifly,
cpc is 1.5mm. many of the cpc's are twisted together, but well secured in the faceplates which I've gone round checking - do you mean this could increase the resistance?
 
Thanks hifly,
cpc is 1.5mm. many of the cpc's are twisted together, but well secured in the faceplates which I've gone round checking - do you mean this could increase the resistance?

the problem with them being twisted is you think they are both under the screw but they may not be and it makes it very hard to split the circuit to test each leg to find any faults, each cpc should be in its own g/y sleve you can then give each wire a good tug to make sure it connected correctly.

off the top of my head if its 2.5/1.5 you should be looking for cpc to be 1.4 time r1
 
Last edited:
Your r2 should be 1.67 times your r1/rn reading if it's the normal 2.5/1.5 T+E so your r2 should be approx 0.85*1.67 = 1.42 so it is a little high. Is it a spur? or just a bad connection.

As your fitting a new board don't really worry about the Zs as for a 30mA RCD your Zs will be 1666 ohms and that is what you enter on your EIC.

As your changing the board you will have to upgrade the bonding to 10mm^ and of course label it.

For you poor IR on the ring final circuit did you have anything plugged into it, or a neon still connected?
 
Whenever i get a low ins res result it is nearly always something I haven't disconnected. ie, Boiler, security light, burglar alarm etc etc. I always do the first test on 250V just to ensure i dont damage anything sensitive to the higher voltage. If that test is ok then i step up to the 500v level. The customer will nearly always forget to tell you about something thats tucked away in the loft, outhouse etc.
 
Your r2 should be 1.67 times your r1/rn reading if it's the normal 2.5/1.5 T+E so your r2 should be approx 0.85*1.67 = 1.42 so it is a little high. Is it a spur? or just a bad connection.

As your fitting a new board don't really worry about the Zs as for a 30mA RCD your Zs will be 1666 ohms and that is what you enter on your EIC.

As your changing the board you will have to upgrade the bonding to 10mm^ and of course label it.

For you poor IR on the ring final circuit did you have anything plugged into it, or a neon still connected?

Thanks all for the tips and clarification. looks like more investigation required into twisted wires and possible poor connection under boards can't access to lift at the moment.

Malcolmsanford, I understand the target calc of 1.42 for r2. I have recorded the highest reading, but in that case it wasn't a spur (!). To show further ignorance though, why does the fact there is a 30mA RCD make Zs 1666 ohms? Is it not governed by the MCB rating and rule of thumb?
 

Reply to First CU change - high R1+R2 reading and other problems! in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
430
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
1K

Similar threads

Thought I'd update this. Finally had my assessment today. I chased them on Friday morning as it'd been about 10-12 weeks since I'd actually made a...
Replies
5
Views
2K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top