Have posted here as this could involve bending the rules. I am working with someone who is undertaking a new build. The proposal for PV involves 1.8kW on a south facing roof (6 x LG300) and 2.0kW (4 x Viridian 500) on a west facing roof of two linked buildings. Something like a 3kW Power-One would be ideal. Here's the rub.
The south facing building which is a big garage with office over is going to be build first, later this year, followed by the main building next. The client would like to get the PV up and running on the first building as soon as complete. Has anyone run a twin tracker on one side only?
Here is the tricky bit. The whole system will not be complete, but it would be easy to register it as such. The customer could then apply for his FIT payments but only receive a reduced amount until the building is complete. By the time the main building is finished, the FIT rate will have dropped by at least the amount of the annual reduction in March 2015, or more if installation levels pick up. Re-registering a larger system would mean the whole thing received a lower payment. We could prop the additional panels up in the garden and plug 'em in.
The amounts of money are relatively small and the returns on his investment are excellent as labour costs are substitutional not incremental in the build.
What do you think?
The south facing building which is a big garage with office over is going to be build first, later this year, followed by the main building next. The client would like to get the PV up and running on the first building as soon as complete. Has anyone run a twin tracker on one side only?
Here is the tricky bit. The whole system will not be complete, but it would be easy to register it as such. The customer could then apply for his FIT payments but only receive a reduced amount until the building is complete. By the time the main building is finished, the FIT rate will have dropped by at least the amount of the annual reduction in March 2015, or more if installation levels pick up. Re-registering a larger system would mean the whole thing received a lower payment. We could prop the additional panels up in the garden and plug 'em in.
The amounts of money are relatively small and the returns on his investment are excellent as labour costs are substitutional not incremental in the build.
What do you think?