Agree, it should disconnect sooner rather than later. But it is a struggle to find a circuit where SC loop impedance would the limiting factor, at least for the type of work I do. Voltage drop almost always gets there first. Very lightly loaded, very long lighting circuits perhaps.

The OSG paragraph is in my previous post #24, but doesn't link to a regulation, and I can't find anything in the regs that directly back it up.
Well I actually dug my osg out last night, dusted it off and cleaned the cobwebs away, and yes it's in there!

That note and looking at the table suggests the loop impedance is the most common limiting factor without a rcd, and my experience would be the same, although the only real occasion in my experience is long remote lighting with small loads.

I don't know of a regulation which determines a required trip time, but obviously there's a subsection for fault protection which doesn't seperate a need between line-line, line-neutral, or live-cpc/earth, basically demanding protection for all types of fault current, whist live-cpc/earth faults do have a specific set of disconnection times
 
Well I actually dug my osg out last night, dusted it off and cleaned the cobwebs away, and yes it's in there!

That note and looking at the table suggests the loop impedance is the most common limiting factor without a rcd, and my experience would be the same, although the only real occasion in my experience is long remote lighting with small loads.

I don't know of a regulation which determines a required trip time, but obviously there's a subsection for fault protection which doesn't seperate a need between line-line, line-neutral, or live-cpc/earth, basically demanding protection for all types of fault current, whist live-cpc/earth faults do have a specific set of disconnection times
Just thinking out loud:

434.5.2
A fault occurring at any point in a circuit shall be interrupted within a time such that the fault current does not cause the permitted limiting temperature of any conductor or cable to be exceeded.

it then goes on to give a rearrangement of the adiabatic to calculate that time. The adiabatic is only accurate for faults lasting up to 5 seconds. Perhaps this is why the OSG wants us to limit the duration of any fault to 5s?
 
Zs is measured to determine whether or not fault protection is achieved. The requirements for fault protection do not concern themselves in any way, shape or form with short circuit protection.

Section 434 is where you will find the requirements for disconnection under short circuit conditions.

To answer the OP's original question, 1667 ohms is the correct value as the sole means of fault protection is the 30mA RCD. If stable TN values have been achieved then the correct value to input would be 7667 ohms.
 
Last edited:

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

YOUR Unread Posts

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread starter

cliffed

Arms
-
Joined
Location
Worcester
If you're a qualified, trainee, or retired electrician - Which country is it that your work will be / is / was aimed at?
United Kingdom
What type of forum member are you?
Electrical Engineer (Qualified)

Thread Information

Title
Just wondering
Prefix
N/A
Forum
Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
32

Thread Tags

Tags Tags
wondering

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
cliffed,
Last reply from
D Skelton,
Replies
32
Views
4,529

Advert

Back
Top