Likelihood of nuisance RCD tripping @ 0.4 megohms | Page 2 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Likelihood of nuisance RCD tripping @ 0.4 megohms in the DIY Electrical Advice area at ElectriciansForums.net

How many circuits does the installation have?
You can't just do an overall IR test of the installation and claim it needs a rewire based on a reading of .4M
You may for example have 5 circuits that have an IR of 2M each which would give you an overall IR of .4M

This also depends how many cores are in each OCPD, and how many spurs are present. Could be absolutely nothing wrong with these cables - or equally as likely IMO, one leg of one circuit bringing the whole installation down.
 
How many circuits does the installation have?
You can't just do an overall IR test of the installation and claim it needs a rewire based on a reading of .4M
You may for example have 5 circuits that have an IR of 2M each which would give you an overall IR of .4M

If he got a global IR of 0.4 M ohm then it should of been investigated further anyway. When tested the individual IR results of each circuit should of been recorded on the EIC.
 
I'm confused here, you have paid for testing of the install and the said 'claimed' electrician has only done global tests on insulation resistance, had any competent Electrician got those results they would have tested at an individual circuit level to identify the circuit.

A you now inform us every circuit has this reading then its possible that because he is incapable of doing a full testing of the installation that you paid him to do that he has probably left a load connected without realising it.

Finally and repeating others here, I would be surprised if an install of only 40yrs was in that bad a condition that the insulation was breaking down, it will most likely be in pvc and still in good form, although I cannot say this for sure because many factors may bring an installation to a premature end.... and hangs a lot on the fact it was installed well too.

Get 'claimed' Electrician back and remind him if you have paid for an Inspection report on only 4 circuits then you expect to have it to have more depth than a global test that says all circuits are at 0.4Mohms...

No Electrician would recommend fitting a board until the said reading had been fully investigated and corrected if need be.

Lastly 0.4Mohms in itself will not cause any tripping issues but its not an exact science as the tester generates a DC test voltage of minimal current and this does not mimic the the real life loaded circuit scenario, it just gives a pointer of possible issues. Ohms Law the most basic Electrical calculation tells you the leakage that would flow, had said Electrician used it he could have informed you with a better answer than he spouted out.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
By the sounds of things it would seem to me that the sparky in question doesn't know what he's doing or he is trying to pull the red and black wool over your eyes
 
Hi. Yes, I'm not a qualified electrician, and I certainly wouldn't be doing any work myself.

The installation needs a full rewire as far as I am aware, but that is not possible for at least a few months, so I want to know if a new CU could be installed in the interim.

The guy that tested was qualified, and he said it "might" trip with a new CU, hence why I am asking you guys for your guesses.

There are four circuits, two lighting and two sockets. He recorded them all as 0.4 megohms.

He reckoned that, given the age of the installation (40 years), the most likely reason was age related breakdown of the insulation on all circuits.

Don't get him back.

Get another sparky to do individual tests on the circuits, it ain't rocket science, nor will it take long with only 4 circuits...... then, and only then, will you know the "real" issues.
 
Hi. Yes, I'm not a qualified electrician, and I certainly wouldn't be doing any work myself.

The installation needs a full rewire as far as I am aware, but that is not possible for at least a few months, so I want to know if a new CU could be installed in the interim.

The guy that tested was qualified, and he said it "might" trip with a new CU, hence why I am asking you guys for your guesses.

There are four circuits, two lighting and two sockets. He recorded them all as 0.4 megohms.

He reckoned that, given the age of the installation (40 years), the most likely reason was age related breakdown of the insulation on all circuits.
So he has done a global IR test, come up with a reading of 0.4 Mohm and not gone any further? sack him then because he hasn't carried out the test correctly
 
Thanks all.

Each circuit is listed in his report, with the 0.4 value recorded for each circuit (neutral to earth). The line to earth readings are actually different (ranging between 0.45 and 0.7).

When he did the readings the electric oven and the fridge could not be unplugged, and I don't believe that he took the lightbulbs out.

I don't think he was after extra work, because I think that he only does testing (and occasional small jobs) , and definitely doesn't do re-wires.
 
Thanks all.

Each circuit is listed in his report, with the 0.4 value recorded for each circuit (neutral to earth). The line to earth readings are actually different (ranging between 0.45 and 0.7).

When he did the readings the electric oven and the fridge could not be unplugged, and I don't believe that he took the lightbulbs out.

I don't think he was after extra work, because I think that he only does testing (and occasional small jobs) , and definitely doesn't do re-wires.
Hate to ask how much he charged for his services ... sounds like a cowboy..

When you say could not be unplugged I assume he isolated the oven at the double pole switch but wondering if he switch the fridge off and left plug in ...

If they were left switched on then he may have sent high voltages into your fridge and oven, this could have damaged the electronics on any timers, displays etc... if you cannot un-plug or isolate it, you don't test it , I have never come across a utility I could not unplug and yes some were a pain to get in and out but it is part of the job... those readings are more likely to do with the fact you have things still plugged in and if he knew what he was doing he would not have sort excuses to leave them plugged... he should have tested at 500v this is to cover peak voltage of the standard AC supply sign wave and this test voltage can damage appliances especially if housing electronics..so if your oven timer or display packs up in the near future you know now you have just paid a bloke to damage your property.

I'd be asking a few questions raised here to this 'Electrician' because I never heard such a stream of excuses for not testing 4 circuits properly!
 
Thanks all.

Each circuit is listed in his report, with the 0.4 value recorded for each circuit (neutral to earth). The line to earth readings are actually different (ranging between 0.45 and 0.7).

I'm really really confused here, so bare with me ...

OP, when you got the electrician in, what did you actually ask him to do? An EICR ?

Most standard cert's don't have a column for N-E on EICR the electrician should either note this down himself somewhere, or if necessary record the reading in further remarks...granted 0.4, 0.45 and 0.7 and whatever else you've got are all **** poor results, BUT - if it says unsatisfactory on the front of the certificate then im failing too see what the electrician has done wrong. He hasn't taken a global IR if you've got different readings for each circuit ....

Unsatisfactory, and then it's up to you to get someone to come and fault find and put everything right. That's if you've got him to just do a report.


^^ i agree with what darkwood said aswell ... surely the cooker and fridge were isolated from a FCU somewhere?
 
Hi Again,
A few clarifications.

Yes, it was an EICR.

He couldn't get to the socket for the fridge, or the isolator for the oven (fridge very hard to move and isolator hidden in very weird place - I found it later, by chance).

He said that he ran the test at lower voltage to protect plugged in equipment.

I've no complaint about his work, because he was just hired for report, I just want to understand the impact on rcd.

I will be doing a full rewire, but cannot do so for a few months, so just want to know if it is workable to get rcd added in the interim. I dont mind that I might end up paying more for rcd now and then rewire eventually.
 

Reply to Likelihood of nuisance RCD tripping @ 0.4 megohms in the DIY Electrical Advice area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
376
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
944
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
1K

Similar threads

Which rcd is it? Is it one for everything, one for a few circuits?
Replies
5
Views
498
  • Question
Thank you for taking the time to help explain this - much appreciated
Replies
7
Views
866

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top