Does the building have a steel structure if so bond to that, as long as the steel is bonded back at the MET which it should be anyway!
The building is structural steel, sheeting rails and cladding,,, I noticed it on a job I looked at last week, the origin isn't that far away were there is a suitable MET and section board, however the contractor has decided to bond steel, water and gas from a sub DB, the sub main is a 16mm SWA cable, using the SWA as the earth.. It interested me as I have never seen that done before, I can see that they have done it because the incoming supplies were close to the DB but I was unsure wether this is acceptable??
 
The building is structural steel, sheeting rails and cladding,,, I noticed it on a job I looked at last week, the origin isn't that far away were there is a suitable MET and section board, however the contractor has decided to bond steel, water and gas from a sub DB, the sub main is a 16mm SWA cable, using the SWA as the earth.. It interested me as I have never seen that done before, I can see that they have done it because the incoming supplies were close to the DB but I was unsure wether this is acceptable??

Using the 16mm SWA as a main earth bonding conductor is NOT acceptable, it will not have an appropriate copper equivalent CSA. The steel wire armouring is fine for use as a CPC but not where protective main earth bonding requirements are also to be met!!
 
I can't believe someone put that connector block on upside down.

It looks absolutely awful lol.
 
Tony mc hit the nail on the head, once that structural steel is bonded, you've got a rather large main protective bonding conductor to 'tap off' to bond other services.
 
Using the 16mm SWA as a main earth bonding conductor is NOT acceptable, it will not have an appropriate copper equivalent CSA. The steel wire armouring is fine for use as a CPC but not where protective main earth bonding requirements are also to be met!!
Thanks engineer 54, I thought as much, seeing things like this makes you think somebody knows something more than you. I didn't want to point it out as incorrect and look stupid if there was a way of doing it that way. Is there a calculation to use to determine the size it must be?? Let's say the sub main was a 150mm SWA cable, would it then be sufficient ? I would always say it has to come from the origin, but surely there will be some kind of calculation that would determine if it was safe. Thanks again, Iam just trying to understand it a bit further as you do :)
 
Generally it is not recommended to use the armouring of SWA as a bonding conductor, especially where the supply is TNCS as there can be currents circulating through the bonding due to the design of the PME system that may have adverse effects on the current carrying capacity of the cable as a whole.

The comparative calculation for steel versus copper as a conductor is that the steel must have a cross sectional area of 8.5 times that of the copper because the steel is less conductive.
This would mean that where a 16mm² copper bonding conductor is in use then a steel conductor would need to be 136mm² to afford the same protection.

16mm² SWA armour has a CSA of 45mm² which is approximately equivalent to 5mm² in copper so unsuitable for any bonding conductor, even is it were an acceptable use of the armour.
 
Best EV Chargers by Electrical2Go! The official electric vehicle charger supplier.

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread Information

Title
main bonding
Prefix
N/A
Forum
Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
21

Thread Tags

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
Ben Butcher,
Last reply from
Richard Burns,
Replies
21
Views
3,329

Advert

Back
Top