View the thread, titled "Minor Predicament over RFC Length" which is posted in UK Electrical Forum on Electricians Forums.

Hi,

I have just started a new build today, its a large U shaped bungalow with vaulted ceilings etc.

I have split the property down into a lot of circuits to help with things due to cable runs etc.

I have just wired a section of it today, I was going to do it all in 4mm radials, but by the time I had got to the end of the section (bedroom, Wardrobe, Study & Entrance Hall) I had used 96 meters, this does not include the leg back to the board which is a further 13 meters....

I had given it though on paper, but then when I started cable routes were not quite so straight forward etc.

Anyway, my problem I have now is that the R1+R2 for that circuit at say 110 meters, will be 1.83 Ohms, which is way too much as was going to put it on a 32A, jees I would have to drop it to a 16A to comply.

So then thought, its ok, illt turn it into a ring, total length will then be 125 meters give or take a meter.

But then thats introduced another issue...

So I am thinking about VD,

Assuming 20A at the furthest point plus an additional 12A evenly distributed, the Ib of 32A then becomes (32 + 20)/2 = 26A, which I would think its fine.

4 x 11.5 x 1000 / 26 / 16 = 110 meters....

So i have got 125 meters, and to stay inside 11.5v I need it to be 110 meters.

However, the predicted readings are:

r1 = 0.57
rn = 0.57
r2 = 1.51

R1+R2 = 0.59

Should I be concerned or even bothered about the 110 meters issue or do I drop it to a 25A or 20A RCBO? but thats not going to overcome the VD.

The Zs will be well within the 1.1 Ohms for 32A

The problem is, there's no way I am going to run 6mm radials, thats just silly.

The other half of the house is even further away from the board, I have intentionally split the circuits down to minimize on length but the further circuit the other side, will be over 100m for a ring and about 80m as a radial...
 
Last edited:
Never had to deal with such long runs as that. Wouldn't one option be to run say a 10mm tail from the broad to closer to the ruing and then run the ring from the end of the 10mm tail?
You'll lose less VD over the 10mm than you would over 2 X 2.5 (you'll lose half as much in fact)
 
in your first scenario, as murdoch said, your assumed Ib is way over. i'd be inclined to assume more like 10 - 12A.

as for the second, you could run a 10mm feeder and then create a ring from that, forming a lollipop circuit.
 
What you have to remember is the mV/A/m values are based on maximum CCC/70 degree conductor operating temp...The cable is not going to be maxed out so in reality the volt drop is going to be less than calculated as it proportional.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Reply to the thread, titled "Minor Predicament over RFC Length" which is posted in UK Electrical Forum on Electricians Forums.

Best EV Chargers by Electrical2Go! The official electric vehicle charger supplier.

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread starter

Joined
Location
Market Harborough

Thread Information

Title
Minor Predicament over RFC Length
Prefix
N/A
Forum
UK Electrical Forum
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
16
Unsolved
--

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
uksparks,
Last reply from
uksparks,
Replies
16
Views
2,412

Advert

Back
Top