Okay, first of all the inverter looks a bit undersized.

Anyway, I get a yield of 2,898kWh from that setup using Sleaford's climate data.

That works out at 1,696kWh from the south west array and 1,202kWh on the north east array.

For comparison reasons, if the inverter was changed for an Aurora 3.6 then the yield comes in at 2,878kWh - which surprised me and shows the importance of sizing inverters correctly.

For further comparison, to get a good idea of how 10 degrees towards north affects the yield, I also modelled this with 8 panels on both sides - the yield comes in at 2,881kWh with the SW array coming in at 1,506kWh and the NE array coming in at 1,375kWh.

The figures definitely seem to be stacking up.
 
The more panels you get on the south west roof, the yield increases (Maybe stating the obvious but from the figures I've posted, it seems to have a pretty big effect)
 
Agree should be about 75% of a perfectly south facing roof with no shading. Only 5% worse than a directly east facing roof.
 

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc
Back
Top