Observations and recommendations | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Observations and recommendations in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

H

Hirst

Iv got contractors doing periodics inspection reports at my work. They seem to be going ott on the properties testing. So what would you guys put the folowing as code wise.

Cables for w/h clipped direct in a cupboard

Cables not harmonised and no sticker present.

Main tails only at 16mm2

Sockets (2.5) and cooker (6) undersized due to thermal insulation. Cables basically run under aprox 150mm of loft insulation.

Also what is max distance a cooker switch or socket can be from a hob and a sink.

Cheers guys be intrested to se your opinions
 
Iv got contractors doing periodics inspection reports at my work. They seem to be going ott on the properties testing. So what would you guys put the folowing as code wise.

Cables for w/h clipped direct in a cupboard
No Code.

Cables not harmonised and no sticker present.
Code 4.

Main tails only at 16mm2
No Code.

Sockets (2.5) and cooker (6) undersized due to thermal insulation. Cables basically run under aprox 150mm of loft insulation.
Code 2.

Also what is max distance a cooker switch or socket can be from a hob and a sink.
There is no Max as far as I'm aware.
Min would be 300mm, although that is not a requirement of BS7671.

Cheers guys be intrested to se your opinions

That's my opinion anyway.
 
Iv got contractors doing periodics inspection reports at my work. They seem to be going ott on the properties testing. So what would you guys put the folowing as code wise.

Cables for w/h clipped direct in a cupboard Hard to comment on this without seeing it for myself, possibly no code at all.

Cables not harmonised and no sticker present. 4.

Main tails only at 16mm2 Would depend on service fuse rating.

Sockets (2.5) and cooker (6) undersized due to thermal insulation. Cables basically run under aprox 150mm of loft insulation. This would need attention, I would attribute a code 2.

Also what is max distance a cooker switch or socket can be from a hob and a sink. Guide to the building regs reccomends 300mm, BS 7671 has no reference.

Cheers guys be intrested to se your opinions


All IMO.
 
Iv got contractors doing periodics inspection reports at my work. They seem to be going ott on the properties testing. So what would you guys put the folowing as code wise.

Cables for w/h clipped direct in a cupboard

Cables not harmonised and no sticker present.

Main tails only at 16mm2

Sockets (2.5) and cooker (6) undersized due to thermal insulation. Cables basically run under aprox 150mm of loft insulation.

Also what is max distance a cooker switch or socket can be from a hob and a sink.

Cheers guys be intrested to se your opinions

Tell me the codes they are using then Ill tell you what I think, I don't do opinions behind the backs of those who can not defend their opinions or actions.

Not ethical imo and against my morals especially towards fellow Electricians.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As do I, they put them all as a code two and marked it as unsatisfactory. And the service fuse was 60a so tails were fine. Cheers guys. Iv got peace of mind when I rais my argument Monday.
 
I agree with Lenny.

Tails only an issue if main fuse 100A or more, then code 2 unless it's a small installation that would struggle to overload them in which case code 4.

Guidance for cooker to isolator is max 2m, but this is guidance not a regulation so I wouldn't code it unless access to the isolator was particularly difficult (like the one I saw yesterday on the wall behind the oven - yes you read that right, behind the oven) and then only a 4 because of it not being a reg.

Guidance for proximity of sockets to sinks (from the NIC) is 300mm min. But this is impossible to achieve sometimes and again is not a regulation.

Haven't got a link at the mo, but look on the ESC website for the best practice guide to PIRs. You may find it helpful and be able to use it as back up.
 
Whilst I find the ESC guides to be very usefull, and I applaud the attempt to bring about a standardisation for coding.
There are some glaring mistakes and ommisions.
For instance the guide for PIRs, does not indicate that lack of RCD protection to bathroom circuits warrents any code at all.
 
Well, isn't that effectively what the ESC guide is? It is, however, just a guide and is not meant to be an all encompassing list of every possible fault on the planet plus its code. No guide could ever be that, it'd make War And Peace look like light bedtime reading.

E54 is right though about some more obvious errors and ommisions. Why not email them to the ESC so they might make the next update (it's been updated a couple of times already)?
 

Reply to Observations and recommendations in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
As the holiday season approaches, PCBWay is thrilled to announce their Christmas & New Year Promotions! Whether you’re an engineer or an...
Replies
0
Views
782
  • Article
Bloody Hell! Wishing you a speedy recovery and hope (if) anyone else involved is ok. Ivan
    • Friendly
    • Like
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
978

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top