Had an interesting session today with the above, ofgem ENA and the Senior network planners or those in charge of Distributed Generation (DG) from WPD, Scottish Power, SSE, UKPowerNetworks and Northern Powergrid
They all know that they have had a bad reputation for dealing with Distributed Generation (DG) and from the messages it seems like they've all had to get their act together.
Specifically SSE and UKPN were made to eat humble pie and embarassed in front of their colleagues from other DNO's quite a fewa times by a number of different people.
Net effect, if you've got a G59 application to submit they are now more than happy to talk first, they all confirmed that one of the big problems they are facing is trying to cope with the reverse flow of large amounts of DG, so would like to talk early to see if there are alternative locations or ways of optimising a location.
Here are the key people:
Northern Powergrid: Derek Fairburn / Mark Johnston
UK Power Networks : Jim Basey / Steve Foster
WPD: Your local area office - call them and they will happily meet with you face to face if you want
SSE: up to 50kW Simon Roberts >50kWp Gary Bartlett
Scottish Power: Paul Brown
G83/2: I brought up the subject of the potential Postcode Lottery for installers, and it was absolutely clear that they had not considered the commercial aspects of this. The change was a DNO centric driven one based on the unscrupulous behaviour of sonme installers NOT pre-applying and also some putting notifications in simply spread over time to get around it. After a bit of discussion ofgem suddenly realised they they were handling the consultation, and they were also under the impression that consultions was still open... so there is still time to get the message over. One of the options considered to level the playing field was to make online maps available showing areas were G83/2 would be applied for >3.68kW, they all come up with a few exceuses why this would take time, however they did acknowledge that they do have the information available to them. They most likely outcome was that they would offer a vary rapid turnaround to those specific applications.
For other areas where G83/2 is needed for 3.68 - 4kWp, the off the record answer from WPD engineers is that they would simply go through on the nod as there was no significant impact on the network if it was 3.68kwp or 4kWp, so their internal policy is to treat them the same.
Hope that helps.
They all know that they have had a bad reputation for dealing with Distributed Generation (DG) and from the messages it seems like they've all had to get their act together.
Specifically SSE and UKPN were made to eat humble pie and embarassed in front of their colleagues from other DNO's quite a fewa times by a number of different people.
Net effect, if you've got a G59 application to submit they are now more than happy to talk first, they all confirmed that one of the big problems they are facing is trying to cope with the reverse flow of large amounts of DG, so would like to talk early to see if there are alternative locations or ways of optimising a location.
Here are the key people:
Northern Powergrid: Derek Fairburn / Mark Johnston
UK Power Networks : Jim Basey / Steve Foster
WPD: Your local area office - call them and they will happily meet with you face to face if you want
SSE: up to 50kW Simon Roberts >50kWp Gary Bartlett
Scottish Power: Paul Brown
G83/2: I brought up the subject of the potential Postcode Lottery for installers, and it was absolutely clear that they had not considered the commercial aspects of this. The change was a DNO centric driven one based on the unscrupulous behaviour of sonme installers NOT pre-applying and also some putting notifications in simply spread over time to get around it. After a bit of discussion ofgem suddenly realised they they were handling the consultation, and they were also under the impression that consultions was still open... so there is still time to get the message over. One of the options considered to level the playing field was to make online maps available showing areas were G83/2 would be applied for >3.68kW, they all come up with a few exceuses why this would take time, however they did acknowledge that they do have the information available to them. They most likely outcome was that they would offer a vary rapid turnaround to those specific applications.
For other areas where G83/2 is needed for 3.68 - 4kWp, the off the record answer from WPD engineers is that they would simply go through on the nod as there was no significant impact on the network if it was 3.68kwp or 4kWp, so their internal policy is to treat them the same.
Hope that helps.