One three-phase breaker, supplying multiple single-phase loads. OK or not? | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss One three-phase breaker, supplying multiple single-phase loads. OK or not? in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Mark42

-
Patron
Joined
May 8, 2010
Messages
442
Reaction score
341
Location
UK
I’m fitting a single-phase car lift in my own workshop.

New three phase sub-main panel 10m from the lift, 16A TP MCB (with TP 30mA RCD upstream) feeding car lift control panel the in middle of the concrete floor, via existing underground (non-ducted) 4c SWA.

Is it OK to mount the following on the control panel, without any additional, separate breakers?

L1 / L2 / L3: TPN red socket, with local TP switch.
L1 only: 16A industrial socket with local SP switch.
L2 only: 13A Switched double socket.
L3 only: The car lift itself.

It’s very useful to have a range of sockets local to the lift, without trailing leads across the floor.

I don’t want to use three separate SP MCBs in the DB because that would mean a shared neutral, with all the issues that brings. Additional cable runs are not possible.

I do want to have TP available at the lift for future-proofing, load balancing, and for the possible future exchange for a three-phase car lift.

It feels a clumsy design, but is it OK electrically?

An overcurrent fault of any one phase will kill the whole panel, that’s fine. An earth leakage fault on any one phase will trip the upstream TP RCD, killing the whole area. Not ideal but OK.

Ideally I’d use a 16A 3-pole RCBO, but such a thing does not appear to exist. I need to limit current to no more than 16A per phase for cable back-protection, as it’s a very long run of 10mm from the supply.
 
Last edited:
No! No! And not Okay electrically!

Thanks, but why not? I like to understand things.


What do you mean here:
"I don’t want to use three separate SP MCBs in the DB because that would mean a shared neutral, with all the issues that brings."

Because there are only four cores available. If I used three MCBs, one on each phase, it would be effectively multiple sources of supply into one panel, with a shared, single neutral conductor.

Consider a fault which breaks one phase only. Not only would there still be two phases live in the panel, but the single neutral would also become live were it to be broken while any load remained connected on either of the two other phases. Very poor and potentially dangerous practice! (Unless I’ve misunderstood something).
 
Last edited:
Oops, I missed something, apologies. The 16A and 13A sockets would be wired on the same phase as they are provision for portable equipment and are adjacent.
 
Last edited:
Sounds very messy would you not be better off fitting a 4 way 3 phase distribution board at the end of the cable and supplying your circuits from that, It would not be ideal feeding a distribution board via an MCB but better than the way you are suggesting
 
Sounds very messy would you not be better off fitting a 4 way 3 phase distribution board at the end of the cable and supplying your circuits from that, It would not be ideal feeding a distribution board via an MCB but better than the way you are suggesting

But he wants wants a neutral for all 3 phases for whatever reason.

This needs to be in the DIY section as he's not a spark obviously.

"Consider a fault which breaks one phase only. Not only would there still be two phases live in the panel, but the single neutral would also become live were it to be broken while any load remained connected on either of the two other phases. Very poor and potentially dangerous practice!

(Unless I’ve misunderstood something)"


Yes.
 
Last edited:
But he wants wants a neutral for all 3 phases for whatever reason.

This needs to be in the DIY section as he's not a spark obviously.

"Consider a fault which breaks one phase only. Not only would there still be two phases live in the panel, but the single neutral would also become live were it to be broken while any load remained connected on either of the two other phases. Very poor and potentially dangerous practice!

(Unless I’ve misunderstood something)"


Yes.

I Don't see your point What I have suggested is use triple pole and neutral supply to supply a 3 phase and neutral DB then fedd the circuits from them , it would be the same as any 3 phase and neutral DB with single phase or triple pole MCBS fitted in it ,
circuit 1L1 16amp RCBO supply socket
Circuit 1L2 16 amp RCBo supplying Twin socket
Circuit 1 L3 16 AMP MCb feeding single phase isolator
Circuit 2 TP 16 amp MCB feeding tripel pole isolator
So tell me how would the neutral become live if one of these MCBS trips ( although the neutral is a live conductor buts being pedantic :) )
 
But he wants wants a neutral for all 3 phases for whatever reason.

This needs to be in the DIY section as he's not a spark obviously.
That is a little belittling of OP tbh. He obviously does understand the theory if you read his post fully. The OP should do as Flanders has suggested. You could also argue that as neutrals for the SP sockets will terminate in control panel enclosure anyway, then you would isolate all three circuits before working on it and would label it as having multiple points of isolation.
 
That is a little belittling of OP tbh. He obviously does understand the theory if you read his post fully. The OP should do as Flanders has suggested. You could also argue that as neutrals for the SP sockets will terminate in control panel enclosure anyway,then you would isolate all three circuits before working on it and would label it as having multiple points of isolation.

Thanks, TJ (and Flanders). Ad Hominem attacks can be revealing.

My initial posts were written late at night and I don't really understand them myself now :)


I agree that another TPN dis board on the car lift post would be ideal but there just isn’t room, plus it’s a bit of an overkill (and overspend) for a few local sockets.


I’ll give up trying to find an imaginative solution, and wire two single-phase circuits down the four-core (blu & brn sleeved), from two single pole RCBOs: one for the lift, one for all the sockets together, and have no TP supply there at all. If needed for portable equipment, an extension lead can be run across the floor.
 
That is a little belittling of OP tbh. He obviously does understand the theory if you read his post fully. The OP should do as Flanders has suggested. You could also argue that as neutrals for the SP sockets will terminate in control panel enclosure anyway, then you would isolate all three circuits before working on it and would label it as having multiple points of isolation.


According to his profile he is a skip robber, best stick to that
 
For the record, I’ll try to be more clear about what I was getting at:

One three-pole 16A MCB feeding potentially single-phase loads. One neutral core. Deliberately protected together to avoid ‘borrowed’ neutrals.

I accept that on first reading that sounds daft, but what is the difference between that and a TPN supply to say a lathe, with a 230V light incorporated into the machine?

Or using, as many people do, an adaptor lead comprising a 16A 5-pin red plug to a single-phase 16A or 13A socket or sockets? Event suppliers sell such things: wired between one phase pin and the neutral. So long as the upstream three-phase protection does not exceed 16A how is that in any way incorrect?

As most on here will know, there’s nothing magic about 3-pole MCBs, they’re only three singles ‘glued together’ and constructed internally so that one pole tripping also trips the other two. If that’s in response to a single-phase fault, then so what?

You could think of my little panel of sockets as a discrete 'appliance' with its own TP supply and local TP isolator.

See picture below of a commercially-available adaptor. There are no incorporated SP breakers, and certainly not an inline distribution board! Consider the car lift to be plugged in to one SP socket, with the other sockets being used for tools. That, electrically, is exactly what I was proposing. Why all the abuse? I really don't understand.
 

Attachments

  • [ElectriciansForums.net] One three-phase breaker, supplying multiple single-phase loads. OK or not?
    32a_415v_adaptor.jpg
    51.7 KB · Views: 106
Last edited:
Can anyone, please, answer my question properly without just taking the p!ss? Whilst entertaining, that’s not helpful to anyone. :)

I’m building a new workshop this week and need some guidance. I’ve had a bit of a mind blank on this one. Here’s another very similar scenario I’m considering: There will be a number of workbenches, each needing one three-phase socket and various single-phase sockets for portable tools, all in a group on a small panel.

16A TP MCB > TP 20A isolator > 16A 5-pin TPN socket (L1/L2/L3/N/PE),13A socket (L1/N/PE) and two 16A sockets (L2/N/PE and L3/N/PE).

Each supplied by one 5-core 2.5mm SY. Each ‘workstation’ is therefore protected by one three-pole MCB, including the single-phase loads.

I usually work alone so it’s unlikely that more than one individual socket will be on-load at any one time.

I’m very short of ways and want to save cable and time: the scissor lift disappears after the weekend.

Despite you lot jumping on my back, I can neither think of nor find anything in the regs that says this is unsafe.

Immediate isolation is available locally by the TP switch; there in no inconvenience in tripping the whole panel at once if there a fault on any one socket.

Have I missed something?
 
I can see no reason why you cant do as you suggest, apart from the provision of RCD protection which is required for all sockets rated at 20a or less. While you could fit a RCD 13a socket at reasonable cost by the time you've added RCD protection to your 16a socket at each station costs will be mounting.
Far better to replace the DB for one of adequate capacity and run out an RFC for 13a sockets and individual radials for 16a sockets etc. RCBO's could then provide the required RCD protection.Probably wont cost a great deal more.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Reply to One three-phase breaker, supplying multiple single-phase loads. OK or not? in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
259
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
742
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
730

Similar threads

Has the cover been removed, is it TP bussbar? I fitted one as @oscar21 linked to a few months ago, it was actually a nice board and with the TP...
Replies
5
Views
603

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top