B
beaman
Hi all,
Today i came across a bit of a problem and to be honest not sure where i stand.
Was called to go and look at a small job, to add a couple of extra sockets to a kitchen. Nice and easy surface mount. When i looked at the c.u it had been installed april this year, so i thought great rcd protected, But when i took the cover off to test the ring found that the ring was on the non protected side of a 16th edition board. So i tested the ring wiring all ok except fot IR test which came back zero so taking spare meter to check IR again in the morning. I connected the ring to the rcd side and rcd will not set?. Now am i resbonsible for this fault because i found it or not?. the worst thing is that the customer is disabled and the company who changed the cu were employed by the local council through a grant, and they didnt leave a cert for the work, but she received the notification paperwork from nic.
HELP
Today i came across a bit of a problem and to be honest not sure where i stand.
Was called to go and look at a small job, to add a couple of extra sockets to a kitchen. Nice and easy surface mount. When i looked at the c.u it had been installed april this year, so i thought great rcd protected, But when i took the cover off to test the ring found that the ring was on the non protected side of a 16th edition board. So i tested the ring wiring all ok except fot IR test which came back zero so taking spare meter to check IR again in the morning. I connected the ring to the rcd side and rcd will not set?. Now am i resbonsible for this fault because i found it or not?. the worst thing is that the customer is disabled and the company who changed the cu were employed by the local council through a grant, and they didnt leave a cert for the work, but she received the notification paperwork from nic.
HELP