A friend of mine has just rang me and asked if someone has the 16th Edition Regs qualification but not the 17th Edition Regs qualification and they do not have the 2391 or 2395/6 should they be working on electrical installs and signing jobs off? I have told him that he needs the 17th Edition Regs no matter what and preferably the 2395/6 qualification to be doing electrical installs and signing them off. What's other people's take on this?
 
A friend of mine has just rang me and asked if someone has the 16th Edition Regs qualification but not the 17th Edition Regs qualification and they do not have the 2391 or 2395/6 should they be working on electrical installs and signing jobs off? I have told him that he needs the 17th Edition Regs no matter what and preferably the 2395/6 qualification to be doing electrical installs and signing them off. What's other people's take on this?

Definitely need 17thfor my 2 penny's worth, if they have the old 2400 then that would also suffice instead of the 2391 as the testing was covered in that as well
 
I think the 17th is vital regardless of the fact it's a multi choice joke.

as for the rest, they need to really hold the equivalent of the current qualms such as 2394/2395 etc and NVQ, so if they did it 100 years ago that's fine so long as it was the equivalent.
 
Owning a copy of and understanding the requirements of the latest version of the regulations is far more important than a multiple guess exam pass.
Any electrician who has undergone a proper training should be capable of testing and certificating their own work. The 2391 or 2394/5 is worthy professional development, but a proper electrician without those qualifications should certainly be expected to be able to test adequately.
 
If they served their apprenticeship under a previous edition of the regulations and have kept up to date with the new edition and amendments then there is no reason they shouldn't be working as an electrician.

I served my apprenticeship under the 16th and the 17th came out not long after I completed. I did the 17th edition course then but haven't done anything since, and the current amendment has quite a lot of differences to the original
 
I suppose the question has to be does not having the 17th edition stop you from reading and understanding the regs and acting on them in a professional manner, the proliferation of meaningless courses is what is swamping this industry with under qualified operatives. The training companies out there have given people the impression that the only qualification needed to be "qualified" is a 17th edition cert when those with many years in the industry know this is far from the truth.

So I suppose if you want proof that somebody can get the right number answers to achieve a pass then yes you would need a 17th edition cert but IMO you don't have to read the 17th ed regs to do it so what does it prove
 
almost anyone can find answers to questions in a book. it's understanding and interpreting the regulations that matters, along with common sense, this latter sadly lacking in today's " get it quick" training.
 
i've got a blue peter badge.
and what Carboot sale did you buy that off.. i did think Blue Peter had stands you know

"A friend of mine has just rang me and asked if someone has the 16th Edition Regs qualification but not the 17th Edition Regs qualification and they do not have the 2391 or 2395/6 should they be working on electrical installs and signing jobs off? I have told him that he needs the 17th Edition Regs no matter what and preferably the 2395/6 qualification to be doing electrical installs and signing them off. What's other people's take on this?"

I think they should have 17th Edition at least, keep up to date with any changes made, with Editions and AMD.
As for the 2391/4+5 a lot of courses have the Testing (what is done in Level 3 Electrical Installations courses) dose the testing as you would do in the 2394/5. But to sign off your own work, being a apart of one of the governing bodies and they say YES can do it, and with or without the 2391/4+5.

I think all they need is 17th Edition and Part P course or 2397 and they can go ahead and sign up for a Governing body. To do Minor work and be under the radar, mm well i guess thats a different matter
 
Last edited by a moderator:
my mother in law is no good at spelling. she cast a spell on me to turn me into a frog. i ended up as a pig.
 
Should do a way with the term qualified, it literally means nothing in todays world.

Competent.

Competent to me always sounds like your at DIY level, I have never liked the term competent as it gives no merit or value to proper training

Whatever term that is used some one will reduce it's value the regs have changed to use the term skilled but no doubt that term will be meaning less in a year or two
 

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Green 2 Go Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses Heating 2 Go Electrician Workwear Supplier
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread starter

Joined
Location
warrington

Thread Information

Title
Qualified or Not!!
Prefix
N/A
Forum
UK Electrical Forum
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
34
Unsolved
--

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
MerlinGremlin,
Last reply from
Lazlo,
Replies
34
Views
3,015

Advert

Back
Top