S
shimoldaman
The return leg of a Ring Circuit in MICC, under the floorboards of an ancient Church built c.1841, is faulty as it continually blows fuses.Has been tested and its Insulation Test fails. As it is a very old foundation there is not a great deal of headroom under the floorboard and the original cables routing to the DB are blocked by a massive stone upon which an extension was added to the Church sides later on.
Replacing like-for-like MICC would be virtually impossible to cable in due to lack of room, access, manoeuvrability and flexibility of an MICC cable. So, would replacing that faulty MICC with a 2.5T+E do the job and satisfy the Regs as the Church has to be inspected before an insurance renewal?
Replacing like-for-like MICC would be virtually impossible to cable in due to lack of room, access, manoeuvrability and flexibility of an MICC cable. So, would replacing that faulty MICC with a 2.5T+E do the job and satisfy the Regs as the Church has to be inspected before an insurance renewal?