RFC testing shenanigans | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss RFC testing shenanigans in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

NDG Elecs

-
Nearly Esteemed
Arms
Joined
Dec 19, 2012
Messages
2,044
Reaction score
1,839
Location
Tyne and Wear
Hello Chap/ettes,

Testing a RFC today. End-End values spot on: 0.19/0.21/0.34. All IR tests good bar N1-CPC2 which was 0.0 mega ohms.

N2-CPC2 was >299 mega ohms.

Why, if I am getting 0.21 and 0.34 on the end-end am I not getting 0.0 m ohms on both neutrals?

Is it to do with the resolution of my meter (MFT1552) for the different tests....I am guessing that IR tests are nowhere near continuity tests in terms of the resolution for each type of test.......me confused, though doesn't take much!

Please take pity on my frazzled brain!

Ta.

*I used the word 'mega' just for you Trev....I know you love it really!
 
Last edited:
IR tests are Done at 500V and end to end is done at 12V, A fault at 500V will show as 000 but at 12V may not show up at all.
 
Thanks for replies. I did redo the tests three times, as was puzzled by it. Double checked nowt was plugged in etc. I also checked the MFT was functioning correctly twice. I have my tester out of its case at least three times a week so am confident I use it correctly!

I see what you are saying Edd but the fault was there and then gone depending on which neutral I tested, both at 500V.
 
Why are you testing IR from one part of the leg to the other?

You only need to test from conductor to conductor

I think you have confused yourself with the testing. You haven't mentioned your R1&R2 and R1&RN, are you doing them?
 
*I used the word 'mega' just for you Trev....I know you love it really!
Yes, I spotted that. Bloody wind up merchant:)
Looks like you're confusing your continuity readings with your IRs mate, it's easily done. It's Friday.
Just test between your conductors as opposed to along them like you're doing now and all will become clear.
We all have brain farts from time to time.
 
Hi,

I am not being rude by not replying; I did start to reply earlier from my phone and promptly fell asleep due to a hard wks graft!
 
Why are you testing IR from one part of the leg to the other?

You only need to test from conductor to conductor

I think you have confused yourself with the testing. You haven't mentioned your R1&R2 and R1&RN, are you doing them?

Hi Widdler,

I am 99% certain of what I am saying mate. r1r2/4 figures were spot on, only seven sockets on circuit and all appeared to be
part of RFC (no spurs) according to test results. r1rN equally satisfactory.

I do realise that you can IR test from one leg only (providing no open ccts on end to end). Testing across both legs is just something, maybe peculiar, I do, don't ask me why! When I say across both legs I will test L1-CPC1, L1-N1, L1-CPC2, L1-N2......and so on.

Cheers
 
Or are you testing IR with the main switch on and the "other" leg of the N connected??

Are you thinking PME here? TT install.

I confess main switch was on Murdoch! Both legs were fully disconnected though, and I could clearly see the outer sheath of the T&Es leg so was not mixing up cables. The board, approx 30 years old, was actually quite neat (for a pleasant change!), and easy to work on.
 
Yes, I spotted that. Bloody wind up merchant:)
Looks like you're confusing your continuity readings with your IRs mate, it's easily done. It's Friday.
Just test between your conductors as opposed to along them like you're doing now and all will become clear.
We all have brain farts from time to time.

Couldn't resist Trev!! Haha!

Was not IR testing as in N-N. I Cont. tested N-N etc, but all IR tests were L-N....L-CPC...N-CPC...

Cheers.

My original post was not that clear, I just re-read it and I sound like I have no idea!

I know what I say does not make sense, that's why I am really puzzled by it.....
 
Think about what you are asking. If your rn end to end is continues how can you get the results you have posted ? And why would you test the IR this way ? So if you are getting 0.00 Meg what is the reading in Ohms or K ohms when ?

I have no idea, hence the question!! As stated, it's just something I do. Regarding your last sentence, I forgot (CRUCIALLY!) that I did get a continuity figure of approx 1.5k ohms on the N-CPC on which I was also getting the 0.0 meg ohms IR.

The unaffected (>299 megohms) N-CPC was open cct as it should be on continuity testing....

The 0.0 meg ohms was N from one leg and CPC from another.

Please, nobody else, go on about why I IR test across the legs! I just do!! Unless of course it is bad to do in some sense, then please enlighten me..I am not the most experienced spark by any means and welcome thoughts etc.

Cheers.
 

Reply to RFC testing shenanigans in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
299
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
807
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
853

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top