We can go the known pros and cons or we can actually tell you when meters are capable of doing without you ever knowing, not suggesting it happens though.
Hi Darkwood.
You are a long term member here, and I respect your experience and knowledge; please take my comments as well intentioned. I don't think we should be putting Gazdkw off getting a smart meter!!
I feel you've presented a slightly cynical view of what this country intended as a valid attempt to make people more aware of their energy use.
I'm retired, admittedly using too much energy (in the kWh sense!) but feel a lot of criticism (generally, I don't mean this particular posting) is directed against smart meters, and the data collection "system", and not enough against the commercial electricity suppliers.
At present different suppliers do not use a common method to send and recieve data
Now all suppliers targets are to install SMETS-2 meters, which do use a common method (sending & receiving data) to two national hubs (independent of the suppliers)
Quite a good narrative of how the Data Communication Company etc is supposed to work here:
Disclaimer: this blog post is about my understanding of the UK’s smart meter data ecosystem and contains some opinions about how it might evolve. These do not in any way reflect those of Ener…
blog.ldodds.com
meaning if you switch supplier you could be lumbered with a charge for them to change your original smart with a new one,
I don't believe suppliers can charge for having to update your meter (eg if it's a SMETS-1 meter). They might refuse to do it though!
I believe following gen models were compatible with more suppliers.
I believe that's all suppliers now.
Now for the toe dip into conspiracy, the meters can be read remotely and they can also be updated ie firmware etc,
True. So can other domestic appliances, security cameras, fire alarms, computers, phones, the list goes on.....
there is in my view the ability to alter charge rates for short periods without anyone knowing, if a supplier is a bit let's say dodgy behind the boardroom curtains then what would stop them?
Well in theory? I don't doubt the design of the meters and the standards to which they are built and tested, as that's well tied down, and I believe, excepting fault conditions, the data is reported accurately. How the suppliers deal with the data is up to their business ethics, and the law. I've had some pretty rubbish experiences from suppliers myself, but not to the extent of 'fiddling the books'. I don't feel such arguments invalidate the goal to install smart meters, and it's not fair to score it a C1 instead of a C3 for something you fear 'might' happen!
Ask your supplier if the meter is a gen 1 and push the question if you leave will any other supplier be able to use the existing smart meter.
Anyway, rant over. Apologies. Please let me know if I've made any false claims!
The glass is empty and it's bed time