- Joined
- Nov 6, 2010
- Messages
- 4,096
- Reaction score
- 723
Went back to a site earlier today to setup the monitoring. When we switched the system back on, the inverter was only reading 2v DC and was only matching up some of the power optimisers - varying between 1 and 15. Checked voltage at plugs and we were getting 16v as expected.
When we spoke to technical support, the gentleman on the line thought that the likely issue would be a power optimiser - perhaps a loose connection or a faulty optimiser. He suggested altering the setup to a string of eight and trying to isolate the problem that way.
Great. Apart from the fact that the ÂŁ550 scaffold has already been dismantled of course. I suggested that replacing the inverter would surely be a better move as this would be cheaper and could solve the problem. He disagreed. I then asked the obvious question - who was going to pay for the scaffold erection? No surprises. All costs would be down to ourselves. I pointed out that I thought this was ridiculous and he explained that "Solar Edge would go out of business if they were to incur the costs themselves." - I then asked the next obvious question. If this would make Solar Edge go out of business then exactly how often IS this happening? He didn't know. To be fair, he was only the technical advisor so it wasn't really his issue anyway.
This does raise an important question - exactly how often do these optimisers go down? And why, if SolarEdge are confident about their product, don't they cover the costs of replacing faulty equipment? It is absolutely nonsensical to expect a trademen to incur scaffold costs AS WELL as labour costs when a product fails.
SolarEdge is a great system, but I am wondering whether the product - or the company - is really ready for the PV market as it stands.
Incidentally, the inverter suddenly sprang in to life while I was speaking to tech support - neither he nor I know why. We are monitoring the system and I'll let the forum know what happens.
When we spoke to technical support, the gentleman on the line thought that the likely issue would be a power optimiser - perhaps a loose connection or a faulty optimiser. He suggested altering the setup to a string of eight and trying to isolate the problem that way.
Great. Apart from the fact that the ÂŁ550 scaffold has already been dismantled of course. I suggested that replacing the inverter would surely be a better move as this would be cheaper and could solve the problem. He disagreed. I then asked the obvious question - who was going to pay for the scaffold erection? No surprises. All costs would be down to ourselves. I pointed out that I thought this was ridiculous and he explained that "Solar Edge would go out of business if they were to incur the costs themselves." - I then asked the next obvious question. If this would make Solar Edge go out of business then exactly how often IS this happening? He didn't know. To be fair, he was only the technical advisor so it wasn't really his issue anyway.
This does raise an important question - exactly how often do these optimisers go down? And why, if SolarEdge are confident about their product, don't they cover the costs of replacing faulty equipment? It is absolutely nonsensical to expect a trademen to incur scaffold costs AS WELL as labour costs when a product fails.
SolarEdge is a great system, but I am wondering whether the product - or the company - is really ready for the PV market as it stands.
Incidentally, the inverter suddenly sprang in to life while I was speaking to tech support - neither he nor I know why. We are monitoring the system and I'll let the forum know what happens.