The point is you cannot allow a set of cables rated for 70C operation to be heated by those happy to run at 90C, so if you are looking at a section for that group, you should treat them all as if they were rated at the lowest temperature (e.g. 70C) when calculating and if you get an acceptable outcome then no problem.
The other aspect to consider is if accessories are rated for, say, 90C operation. Again that very much depends on the use-case of the cable, and if you took an example of, say, 6mm and found the 70C case such as Table 4D2A works for all segments of the route (with possibly differing "method" and grouping) you have nothing to worry about.
So if you had a 6mm cable going through a hot area, or an area of high thermal insulation (like method 103, etc) you might select 90C type of insulation, then you could do checks to see:
- Is the CCC of 90C insulation in a hot area with de-rating acceptable?
- Is the CCC of 90C traversing in, say method 103, acceptable?
- If I use the same CSA in 70C insulation, am I meeting the CCC in method B for common accessories?
- When grouped with other cables with a 70C rating, if I used 70C parameters for my cable would I meet CCC grouped?
If none of those has a "no" answer then your choice of cable is safe, subject to meeting VD and Zs for ADS.