Hi @Dan (and staff - @Marvo , @darkwood , @GMES , @Leesparkykent ),
Since we seem to be getting spam attacks at the moment, could I suggest a way they could be dealt with to help keep the forum clear of their carp?
Obviously, dealing with them properly requires staff intervention at the moment (deleting, banning etc.), but as we've seen over the last few days, it's all too easy for them to post lots of messages causing normal users the inconvenience of not being able to see the real messages.
I know we can ignore them, but that is a purely superficial fix.
Does the forum have facilities to ban people based on them being reported by users? That's the first part of the temporary solution.
Can the forum be configured to ignore banned users? That's the second part of the temporary solution.
If not, could it be made to do this?
My thinking is, if a user is reported by say multiple people in a given period, they are automagically banned and ignored globally (the last part may not be needed if, whilst banned, their posts are automatically filtered out).
It could be argued that this could be abused to silence people... and that concern is justified... however, I think we are all mature enough for that not to happen.
It could also be argued that spammer users could silence legitimate users using the same mechanism. Maybe a fix for that is that only members of the Arms and TAs count when it comes to this automagic ban.
Just a thought about how we may be able to provide a quick solution to the current problem.
The obvious benefit of this is that it's not deleting people, they are just banned, allowing for a follow up by staff to ensure that the system isn't being abused.
Just a thought
Since we seem to be getting spam attacks at the moment, could I suggest a way they could be dealt with to help keep the forum clear of their carp?
Obviously, dealing with them properly requires staff intervention at the moment (deleting, banning etc.), but as we've seen over the last few days, it's all too easy for them to post lots of messages causing normal users the inconvenience of not being able to see the real messages.
I know we can ignore them, but that is a purely superficial fix.
Does the forum have facilities to ban people based on them being reported by users? That's the first part of the temporary solution.
Can the forum be configured to ignore banned users? That's the second part of the temporary solution.
If not, could it be made to do this?
My thinking is, if a user is reported by say multiple people in a given period, they are automagically banned and ignored globally (the last part may not be needed if, whilst banned, their posts are automatically filtered out).
It could be argued that this could be abused to silence people... and that concern is justified... however, I think we are all mature enough for that not to happen.
It could also be argued that spammer users could silence legitimate users using the same mechanism. Maybe a fix for that is that only members of the Arms and TAs count when it comes to this automagic ban.
Just a thought about how we may be able to provide a quick solution to the current problem.
The obvious benefit of this is that it's not deleting people, they are just banned, allowing for a follow up by staff to ensure that the system isn't being abused.
Just a thought