S
SW1970
Just got back from a survey for a quote for outside socket for family friend. Did usual check of earthing arrangement. Discovered gas and water main protective bonding are both connected at MET, run to intended destinations by point of entry of gas and water, but are left coiled up and not connected (both coils not visible until I had a rummage - one below a floorboard, other not visible behind a kitchen unit), and there's no BS951 clamps present. Friend moved in three years ago and house had a refurb by vendor (I think a buy-refurb-sell vendor) just prior to moving in, including CU upgrade. Looks like installation sparks has signed off and cleared off without finishing the job properly, or maybe it was a dodgy cert.
Friend has original building surveyors report and installation certs. Haven't yet seen these documents but will tomorrow. I'm going to do the remedials (not a big job after all!) so I can proceed with the outside socket works. Question is, if these documents are inadequate, and I suspect they will be, what are thoughts on recommendations to client about attempting to recover costs from either the original surveyor or the sparks or both? Am I barking up wrong tree or do you think there might be some mileage in it? Friend is bothered about the principles and now has a concern about rest of installation. Might be looking at a PIR which could possibly be costed back to certifier. As it happens CU has kitchen sockets and upstairs sockets on non RCD side of the board. One kitchen socket is right by back door which could be reasonably be assumed to power outside equipment (and is in fact). Not sure of date on cert yet, so there's potentially a breach of 16th edition 471-16-01 or 17th equivalent 411.3.3 so it looks like there's a second point of concern with original cert. Thanks loads for your advice, SW.
Friend has original building surveyors report and installation certs. Haven't yet seen these documents but will tomorrow. I'm going to do the remedials (not a big job after all!) so I can proceed with the outside socket works. Question is, if these documents are inadequate, and I suspect they will be, what are thoughts on recommendations to client about attempting to recover costs from either the original surveyor or the sparks or both? Am I barking up wrong tree or do you think there might be some mileage in it? Friend is bothered about the principles and now has a concern about rest of installation. Might be looking at a PIR which could possibly be costed back to certifier. As it happens CU has kitchen sockets and upstairs sockets on non RCD side of the board. One kitchen socket is right by back door which could be reasonably be assumed to power outside equipment (and is in fact). Not sure of date on cert yet, so there's potentially a breach of 16th edition 471-16-01 or 17th equivalent 411.3.3 so it looks like there's a second point of concern with original cert. Thanks loads for your advice, SW.
Last edited by a moderator: