SWA armouring as cpc and Protective Bonding. | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss SWA armouring as cpc and Protective Bonding. in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

R

rattlehead85

Was asked today why we can use the armouring of an SWA as an Earthing conductor but not as a main protective bonding conductor unless we apply the resistivity formula for steel which result is8x that of copper. Can anybody explain this in simple terms because the person i am trying to explain this to cant understand why the same formula isn't used when we employ the armouring as an earthing conductor in its own right. [emoji120]
 
When armour is used as an earthing conductor the adiabatic equation (543.1.3) is used, and this relates to the possible fault current and fault clearing time associated with the protective device of the circuit.

Bonding has no relationship to the protective device of a circuit, when PME is used the size of the bonding conductor is based on the size of the supply neutral conductor (Table 54.8), for all other earthing arrangements the size of the bonding conductor should be not less than the CSA required for the earthing conductor of the installation and not less than 6mm (544.1.1).

eg. For a typical domestic installation with PME, the bonding size is 10mm (for copper), if you supply a garage and need bonding then the CSA of the armour would need to be >90mm (using steel versus copper @ x9)
 
When working out suitability for a circuit protective conductor you are considering how it will perform with a very high current of short duration.
i.e the fault current flowing before the CPD performs ADS. Therefore you consider the thermal properties of the conductor as well as the resistance which gives you the k values for the adiabatic equation.

When designing for bonding you are interested solely in the resistance of that conductor in order to reduce the volt drop between exposed and extraneous conductive parts so as to maintain a low touch voltage (<50V). The current flow in a bonding conductor should be minimal and so there are no effects of heating and EMF forces so no consideration is taken of the thermal properties of the conductor.
 
Last edited:

Reply to SWA armouring as cpc and Protective Bonding. in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Sticky
  • Article
Wicked I've just actually looked through it and it's very smart. Some good stuff in it. There's a tile association company that do a magazine...
Replies
2
Views
274
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
269
  • Article
Hi everyone, Another weekend, another sale! Get ready for colder days with Haverland Radiators, combining efficiency with modern design. Keep...
Replies
0
Views
350

Similar threads

totally agree
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Question
It's the same with any system, if you put poo in, you get poo out!
Replies
4
Views
1K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top