SAP really is utterly useless at predicting PV performance in most situations tbf.
good news though, and should hopefully have that customer out there spreading the word for you.
good news though, and should hopefully have that customer out there spreading the word for you.
Not wanting to sound ungrateful, but it seems that nowadays that the SAP is a bare minimum acceptable generation target. If an installation isn't meeting SAP, there's either something wrong with the installation or design, or badly miscalculated by the salesman in the suit and posh car, or you've been very unlucky with the weather.
I reckon that SAP+10% is a more realistic "average" generation estimate.
Met Office mapped cimate averages here:
Met Office: UK mapped climate averages
.
Actually there are other factors. You could be off-south, yet closer to south than SE. You could have shading - yet not enough to warrant an 0.8 factor applied.
Just because the last couple of years have been good climate-wise, doesn't mean that we won't have a 800Wh per kWp next year - or less.
Cooler weather, does that not give better perfomance?
Yes, it does.
But here, we went from 19th February to 26th of March before seeing a dawn-to-dusk day of sunshine - and even when we got it, it was very hazy sunshine and my 3.75kWp panels only managed 18kWh of generation for the whole day.
In that several week period, we experienced the most fog, mist and thick cloud cover I've ever known - along with quite a lot of rain. The weather is not at all like this usually.
.
Or you are only taking more notice of the weather due to the investment it holds maybe ?
Reply to the thread, titled "System outperforms SAP by 19%" which is posted in Solar PV Forum | Solar Panels Forum on Electricians Forums.