Testing (part P required??)

[Spudnik]

Eddie,

The 2391 is a way of proving competence in inspection and testing.

Now, we all know how true that is, considering how difficult it is to pass it.

However, one is seen as not competent if this qualification is not held.

 

[benwill87]

exactly grumpy

 

[grumpy17]

Thanks for clearing that up Jason.So basically the guy from labc may not be as qualified as the bloke who installed it,(a rare case im sure. But because hes holding the microphone so to speak he can decide whether its good enough or not.Pays to be in a scheme to save all the hassle which I guess is the idea anyway.

 

[Spudnik]

Elecsa do not insist you use their forms.

However, they make them freely available to DL with serial numbers in the members section of the website.

I cant speak for the others though.

Maybe some others can.

Thanks for clearing that up Jason.So basically the guy from labc may not be as qualified as the bloke who installed it,(a rare case im sure. But because hes holding the microphone so to speak he can decide whether its good enough or not.Pays to be in a scheme to save all the hassle which I guess is the idea anyway.

Yes as they will instrcut a company to carry out the testing and certification of an un-registered installers work if they decide it needs it. The onus is on LABC.